Re: [fossil-users] Something like rollback

This is close to what I'm looking for. Thank you. -Nick On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:13:38 -0400 > Simon Tremblay wrote: > > > On 8/15/12 12:21 PM, Nick Zalutskiy wrote: >

[fossil-users] Something like rollback

My situation: * Working on a new feature. * Multiple files edited. * Notice a bug in another file, fix it. * Decide to commit just that file with the fix. * Type: fossil com -m "Small fix." [and crucially press enter by mistake before specifying the file name to commit] * ALL changes get committed

Re: [fossil-users] fossil http does not allow periods in fossil name, fossil server does

ief? Non of this is catastrophic, but... surprised me nonetheless. Thanks! -Nick On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Nick Zalutskiy wrote: > > I have setup fossil to serve repositories using inetd (xinetd in my case) as > per http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/server.wiki >

[fossil-users] fossil http does not allow periods in fossil name, fossil server does

I have setup fossil to serve repositories using inetd (xinetd in my case) as per http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/server.wiki Lets say http://example.com:8585 is serving from /home/fossil/repos and there are two fossil files in there: repo1.fossil repo.name.with.periods.fossil The

[fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

I'm using fossil for the first time, on a new project -- it hurts how pragmatic and elegant fossil is, I had to try it. Over the years, I've developed some habits from hg and git that I can't seems to reconcile with how fossil does things. Can somebody tell me what I'm missing or how my workflow ne