-Original Message-
From: Warren Young
* The second is the presence of free pages not yet vacuumed. This is
unused space that IMO ‘unfairly’ lowers the ratio.
I disagree. The unused free pages *should* be charged against you, because
that is space Fossil is taking on your disk, and
On Dec 13, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote:
>
> * The first is the inclusion of un-versioned files which although inflate the
> total file size have no play in the versioning part, which is what I believe
> the compression ratio was meant to highlight.
If unversioned
It appears that the compression ratio shown with the ‘fossil db –db-check’
command is based on the actual total file size of the repo against the would-be
size of all expanded versions stored separately (based on description here:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/stats.wiki).
3 matches
Mail list logo