Re: [fossil-users] CGI issues

2010-05-20 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.czwrote: I tried installing fossil as CGI on Apache 1.3 and there is some difference form what is in the docs. Firstly I had to use a script like this: #!/path-to-fossil/fossil cgi repository: /path-to-repo.fossil Note the

Re: [fossil-users] CGI issues

2010-05-20 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 20 May 2010 08:58, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: I tried installing fossil as CGI on Apache 1.3 and there is some difference form what is in the docs. Firstly I had to use a script like this:

[fossil-users] CGI issues

2010-05-19 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello I tried installing fossil as CGI on Apache 1.3 and there is some difference form what is in the docs. Firstly I had to use a script like this: #!/path-to-fossil/fossil cgi repository: /path-to-repo.fossil Note the cgi parameter. Without that the server would just report an internal

Re: [fossil-users] CGI issues

2010-05-19 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.czwrote: Is the cgi feature well tested? The whole fossil website at http://www.fossil-scm.org/ is an instance of fossil running as CGI. (But not off of Apache 1.3.) -- - D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] CGI issues

2010-05-19 Thread Steve Landers
On 20/05/2010, at 8:30 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: Is the cgi feature well tested? The whole fossil website at http://www.fossil-scm.org/ is an instance of fossil running as CGI. (But not off of Apache 1.3.)