Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On 14 February 2016 at 18:04, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Karel Gardas on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:57:35 +0100: > >> Do you mean original RPi? If so, this is ARM11 design, so single-issue >> in-order pipeline at 700 MHz? I would not bet on this in comparison >> with

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:41:33 -0700 Scott Robison wrote: > I wonder if I could build fossil for my old Commodore 64. It would > certainly require a lot of disk swapping. Not virtual memory paging, > literal "Please insert Disk 43" type disk swapping. :) (I know it's a

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:03 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > > I suspect the oldest thing you could get Fossil running on without massive > > code changes are Unix workstations from around 1990,

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Feb 13, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Scott Robison > wrote: > > > > I wonder if I could build fossil for my old Commodore 64. > > No way. Contemporary compilers would have been pre-ANSI, so they wouldn’t

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Feb 13, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > I wonder if I could build fossil for my old Commodore 64. No way. Contemporary compilers would have been pre-ANSI, so they wouldn’t even understand the function signatures, for a start. > It would certainly

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

Thus said Karel Gardas on Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:57:35 +0100: > Do you mean original RPi? If so, this is ARM11 design, so single-issue > in-order pipeline at 700 MHz? I would not bet on this in comparison > with 3-wide issue out-of-order Celeron design even this is running > only on 300 MHz.

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: >> I use an old IBM Thinkpad 240. It has 256MB of RAM and a 300Mhz Celeron >> and a 6GB hard drive. It's running OpenBSD 5.8 and it took a long time >> to clone the Fossil repository on it. Most of the time was

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:37:51PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > Just an FYI: I use a circa-2002 iBook for testing SQLite on (32-bit > big-endian) PPC. The iBook is loaded with Mac OS 10.2. 20GB hard > disk and 256MB of RAM. > > Fossil still compiles and runs fine on that old dinosaur. It

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

Thus said Martin Gagnon on Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:45:06 -0500: > I use a ClamShell iBook Firewire (366Mhz G3, also big endian) from > 1999-2000. It's my backup server where I push all my repositories. I use an old IBM Thinkpad 240. It has 256MB of RAM and a 300Mhz Celeron and a 6GB hard

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > I use an old IBM Thinkpad 240. It has 256MB of RAM and a 300Mhz Celeron > and a 6GB hard drive. It's running OpenBSD 5.8 and it took a long time > to clone the Fossil repository on it. Most of the time

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On 13 February 2016 at 11:25, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Andy Bradford > wrote: >> >> I use an old IBM Thinkpad 240. It has 256MB of RAM and a 300Mhz Celeron >> and a 6GB hard drive. It's running OpenBSD 5.8 and it

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

Hello, On 12 February 2016 at 20:37, Richard Hipp wrote: > Just an FYI: I use a circa-2002 iBook for testing SQLite on (32-bit > big-endian) PPC. The iBook is loaded with Mac OS 10.2. 20GB hard > disk and 256MB of RAM. > > ... Just for fun I tried to build a recent Fossil on

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On 2/13/16, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > Just for fun I tried to build a recent Fossil on a Pentium 150 box > with 40 MB RAM, no swap, using GCC 4.1.2 prerelease on NetBSD 4.0 > BETA2. Unfortunately there's not enough free memory to build > sqlite3.c. > Have you tried turning

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On 2/13/16, jungle Boogie wrote: > On 13 February 2016 at 11:25, Stephan Beal wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Andy Bradford >> wrote: >>> >>> I use an old IBM Thinkpad 240. It has 256MB of RAM and a 300Mhz

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:25:19 +0100: > If you're that hard-up for a machine, i've got a Raspberry Pi you can > have ;). Haha, it isn't my primary machine, just one that I enjoy tinkering on, but thanks for the offer. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400056c003e8

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

I wonder if I could build fossil for my old Commodore 64. It would certainly require a lot of disk swapping. Not virtual memory paging, literal "Please insert Disk 43" type disk swapping. :) On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Stephan Beal

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On 13 February 2016 at 21:45, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 2/13/16, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> >> Just for fun I tried to build a recent Fossil on a Pentium 150 box >> with 40 MB RAM, no swap, using GCC 4.1.2 prerelease on NetBSD 4.0 >> BETA2. Unfortunately

[fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

Just an FYI: I use a circa-2002 iBook for testing SQLite on (32-bit big-endian) PPC. The iBook is loaded with Mac OS 10.2. 20GB hard disk and 256MB of RAM. Fossil still compiles and runs fine on that old dinosaur. It syncs up with modern servers. Performance is perky - not blistering fast,