On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Antoine Chavasse wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > About general reliability: I've never encountered any data
> > loss/corruption with Fossil
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Antoine Chavasse wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > About general reliability: I've never encountered any data
> loss/corruption with Fossil.
> ...
>
I am very trusty of fossiI. I compile it from trunk, I have an
> a
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
wrote:
>
> About general reliability: I've never encountered any data loss/corruption
> with Fossil. This is even when I use my own compiled versions derived from
> the trunk at random moments. It's also quite rare to read about any bugs i
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
>
> Is revert like 'shun' in that it permanently removes artifacts from the
> repository?
>
> Stephen
I understood revert to revert things like merges and local changes,
rather than affecting the repository itself.
Wes
On Jul 27, 2011, at 15:22 , Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> Is revert like 'shun' in that it permanently removes artifacts from the
> repository?
It works on local copy, not the repository. So it deals with on-disk files, not
artifacts.
Kind regards,
Remigiusz Modrzejewski
_
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Eric wrote:
> As I understand it, the repository was never destroyed at all, and
> uncommitted chages were destroyed by a "fossil revert" which does exactly
> that by design.
I think it is worth mentioning you can undo a revert - but only if you do so
immediately.
On Tue, July 26, 2011 8:07 am, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:20:31 -0700
> Russ Paielli wrote:
>
>> I posted a recommendation for Fossil earlier today on a Scala forum (see
>> my
>> earlier post today on this forum). I got this reply:
>>
>> And [Fossil] is reported to destroy reposit
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Russ Paielli wrote:
And [Fossil] is reported to destroy repositories if someone branches:
http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1306005291.html
I expect that mr. Shaw will shoot himself in the foot using "git rebase"
or "git push --force" one day and abandon git for something
On Jul 26, 2011, at 09:07 , Mike Meyer wrote:
>> And [Fossil] is reported to destroy repositories if someone branches:
>> http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1306005291.html
>>
>> Any comments?
>
> Already discussed at length on the list
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.o
On Tue, July 26, 2011 7:20 am, Russ Paielli wrote:
> I posted a recommendation for Fossil earlier today on a Scala forum (see
> my
> earlier post today on this forum). I got this reply:
>
> And [Fossil] is reported to destroy repositories if someone branches:
> http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/13060
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:20:31 -0700
Russ Paielli wrote:
> I posted a recommendation for Fossil earlier today on a Scala forum (see my
> earlier post today on this forum). I got this reply:
>
> And [Fossil] is reported to destroy repositories if someone branches:
> http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1
I posted a recommendation for Fossil earlier today on a Scala forum (see my
earlier post today on this forum). I got this reply:
And [Fossil] is reported to destroy repositories if someone branches:
http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1306005291.html
Any comments?
--Russ P.
--
http://RussP.us
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
