Hello,
downloading a tarball for a fossil checkin, gives different file contents at
every download I try.
I'd like the tarball contents to be fixed for every checkin. Do you know if this
can be done? Do you all would prefer having fixed contents? What makes the
contents change at every download?
2011/9/28 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
Hello,
downloading a tarball for a fossil checkin, gives different file contents
at
every download I try.
I'd like the tarball contents to be fixed for every checkin. Do you know if
this
can be done? Do you all would prefer having fixed
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:10:16AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
2011/9/28 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
The zlib compressor adds a timestamp at the beginning. If you gunzip the
tarballs, you'll find that they are identical.
Hello,
Can we set the timestamp at will, for example,
The zlib compressor adds a timestamp at the beginning. If you gunzip the
tarballs, you'll find that they are identical.
If I read gzip specs correctly, it allows zero timestamp:
MTIME (Modification TIME)
This gives the most recent modification time of the original file being
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Dmitry Chestnykh
dmi...@codingrobots.comwrote:
The zlib compressor adds a timestamp at the beginning. If you gunzip the
tarballs, you'll find that they are identical.
If I read gzip specs correctly, it allows zero timestamp:
MTIME (Modification TIME)
I already checked in a change that sets the timestamp based on the check-in
time. But I like your patch better (since it is simpler).
Hehe, I started writing something similar, but was scared away by many changes
required to do this, and was not sure if I the manifest time was the correct
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:53:18PM +0200, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
I already checked in a change that sets the timestamp based on the check-in
time. But I like your patch better (since it is simpler).
Hehe, I started writing something similar, but was scared away by many
changes required
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh
dmi...@codingrobots.comwrote:
Anyway, your change is better in case the are ungzip implementations that
do not handle 0 time correctly, plus we get a nice proper timestamp when
gunzipping.
FWIW: +1
--
- stephan beal
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Dmitry Chestnykh
dmi...@codingrobots.com wrote:
Richard wrote:
I already checked in a change that sets the timestamp based on the check-in
time. But I like your patch better (since it is simpler).
Anyway, your change is better in case the are ungzip
9 matches
Mail list logo