Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-02-01 Thread k
on Feb 01, 2013, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm not sure if I understand what's being said, but if I do, I would disagree that Fossil sans networking support would be nearly useless. I use Fossil locally exclusively. I may be in the minority. I do not know. Nearly meaning

Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-01-31 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:02 PM, K. Fossil user ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr wrote: Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the full one which will forbid the static option ? Isn't that a good idea ? That's like asking, why not have a fossil which has no

Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-01-31 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:02:59PM +, K. Fossil user wrote: in another word it is not possible to link staticly... For little project, no hardware acceleration devices does not hurt. But, for projects that need secure connections with numerous users, it will be crucial. Let imagine

Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-01-31 Thread K. Fossil user
1/ RedHat is a company that needs to earn money. If static compiling is used then few people may need to buy their products. If you read what is written, it is not said IMPOSSIBLE. It is said DISCOURAGED, which is TOTALLY not the same. As I said, it should be possible to dynamically linking, but I

Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-01-31 Thread k
Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the full one which will forbid the static option ? Isn't that a good idea ? That's like asking, why not have a fossil which has no networking support? and the answer is, because it would be nearly useless. On modern Linuxes the

Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-01-31 Thread K. Fossil user
suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the full one which will forbid the static option ? Isn't that a good idea ? That's like asking, why not have a fossil which has no networking support? and the answer

Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-01-31 Thread k
. I'm used to fossil-users@ being in the from address of mailing list emails. De : K k...@lightpowered.org À : ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 février 2013 0h45 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used Why don't fossil

Re: [fossil-users] I suggest a lite release of fossil so --static could be used

2013-01-31 Thread Edward Berner
On 1/31/2013 2:02 PM, K. Fossil user wrote: in another word it is not possible to link staticly... For little project, no hardware acceleration devices does not hurt. But, for projects that need secure connections with numerous users, it will be crucial. Let imagine accountants that need speed