On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote:
> OK, thanks.
>
> But, what would be wrong with using / which is closer semantically, and
> compatible to both Linux and Windows path syntax?
>
Just to avoid potential ambiguity and user confusion (because Unix users
expect / to mean some
OK, thanks.
But, what would be wrong with using / which is closer semantically, and
compatible to both Linux and Windows path syntax?
From: Stephan Beal
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 7:46 PM
To: fossil-users
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Is there a way to specify paths relative to
There's not currently, and if someone wants to implement it i would suggest
: as a prefix, since fossil does not allow : in file names (for Windows
compatibility).
- stephan
Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity, typos,
and top-posting.
On Sep 7, 2017 18:43, "Ton
For example, assuming a checkout tree like this:
lib/file
a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/j/file
and while inside the j subdirectory, I want to refer to lib/file by doing
something like:
fossil tim –p /lib/file
instead of
fossil tim –p ../../../../../../../../lib/file
(and not sure if I got the number of .
4 matches
Mail list logo