Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 9:57 PM, wrote: > Really, I am only implying some minimal file statistic like 'DeltaSize(%)' > or somesuch to show the user it is in fact compared internally. The current > message contradicts what is in fact happening. Maybe change that message to > "Cannot visually displ

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
Really, I am only implying some minimal file statistic like 'DeltaSize(%)' or somesuch to show the user it is in fact compared internally. The current message contradicts what is in fact happening. Maybe change that message to "Cannot visually display binary diffs. DeltaSize(%) = -10". On Sun, De

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 9:06 PM, wrote: > Thanks. I didn't know how binary was handled given the Timeline diff > response = "cannot compute difference between binary files". > That message is a bit misleading. It really means a "visual difference." There isn't a mechanism to show a textual diff

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
Thanks. I didn't know how binary was handled given the Timeline diff response = "cannot compute difference between binary files". I think it would be cool if instead fossil listed some of the metrics used or determined in the binary delta operation. Thanks for Fossil! On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:5

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:44 PM, wrote: > Ah, is there a way to quantify the binary delta? > If I have a 1MB binary file and commit a 1 byte change, what is the size > of the computed binary delta? > Very, very small: Create two binaries with a one-byte difference: [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/l

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
Ah, is there a way to quantify the binary delta? If I have a 1MB binary file and commit a 1 byte change, what is the size of the computed binary delta? You are correct of course, but I tend not to extend the spirit of fossil to binary files and images. It is their existence and not legacy that is

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread Mark Janssen
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:37 PM, wrote: > I am curious what is stored in the repo for each new commit that includes > a tiny change to a binary file. > Whether a dll or an image file, is fossil storing each binary file > compressed, uncompressed or some sort of delta? > Over time(6mo's to 1yr), I

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, wrote: > I am curious what is stored in the repo for each new commit that includes > a tiny change to a binary file. > Whether a dll or an image file, is fossil storing each binary file > compressed, uncompressed or some sort of delta? > A binary delta. > Ove

[fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

2013-12-22 Thread sky5walk
I am curious what is stored in the repo for each new commit that includes a tiny change to a binary file. Whether a dll or an image file, is fossil storing each binary file compressed, uncompressed or some sort of delta? Over time(6mo's to 1yr), I would like to reduce my repo size by purging really