On Wed, 8 May 2013, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> _Seems_ (without having looked at the code yet) to be an
> over-eager loop in Th_ErrorMessage. i'll have a look at it this
> evening.
>
>
> My suspicion was wrong but the backtrace
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/fossil]$ ./fossil test-th-eval info
> TH_ERROR: Expected sub-command
>
[stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/fossil]$ ./fossil test-th-eval 'info exists'
TH_ERROR: wrong # args: should be "info exists var"
[stephan@host:~/cvs/
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> _Seems_ (without having looked at the code yet) to be an over-eager loop
> in Th_ErrorMessage. i'll have a look at it this evening.
>
My suspicion was wrong but the backtrace lead to the problem: out-of-bounds
access to an array element. This
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> I see the same.
i suspected it was recursion, but gdb proves me wrong:
[stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/fossil]$ ./fossil test-th-eval info
...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
__memcpy_ssse3_back () at
../sysdeps/x86
I see the same.
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:02:28PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> Caught by a chance (try evaluate "info" in TH1 without a sub-command)
>
> % ./fossil test-th-eval info ;# bomb (100% cpu/mem usage)
> Segmentation fault
>
> Is it reproducible?
>
> More pain for a server
>
>
Caught by a chance (try evaluate "info" in TH1 without a sub-command)
% ./fossil test-th-eval info ;# bomb (100% cpu/mem usage)
Segmentation fault
Is it reproducible?
More pain for a server
/admin_th1
TH1:
[info ]
[ ]
[ ]
6 matches
Mail list logo
