On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 6 August 2012 17:00, Stephan Beal wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Michal Suchanek
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I could easily give you a few things that I still find broken in
> >> fossil, and I guess I am not the only person ;-)
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> I beg to differ. There should be some feature set which when
> implemented bug-free would make a piece of software finished.
Fossil's core features have been stable/bug-free for years. Everything
since 2008 has just been icing on the cake
On 6 August 2012 17:00, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>>
>> I could easily give you a few things that I still find broken in
>> fossil, and I guess I am not the only person ;-)
>
>
> There will ALWAYS be things to fix/improve. That's the beauty of
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:41 AM, David Given wrote:
> What will be new in the new version?
>
>
Tentative summary of changes:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/changes.wiki
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fo
Would it be possible that the prebuilt binaries where compiled with SSL?
(if necessary, including the dependency libraries)
RR
2012/8/6 Richard Hipp
> It has been a long time since we have done an official release of Fossil
> with prebuilt binaries. We should probably do another soon.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 6 August 2012 14:14, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> Given that next to nobody who uses fossil uses the release I guess
> next release is overdue.
>
You'd be surprised how many people post to the list complaining about
problems with year-old
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> I wasn't
> aware how stable was trunk meant to be.
>
The fossil website itself, and the SQLite website, and the Tcl/Tk website,
all typically run from something very close to the tip of trunk. Generally
speaking, it is always safe
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:41:36PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
> [...]
> > Given that next to nobody who uses fossil uses the release I guess
> > next release is overdue.
>
> *raises hand*
>
> I use Debian, which means I use the version supplied by my package
> manager, and
Michal Suchanek wrote:
[...]
> Given that next to nobody who uses fossil uses the release I guess
> next release is overdue.
*raises hand*
I use Debian, which means I use the version supplied by my package
manager, and that version is the same as the prebuilt binaries.
I imagine that the other d
On 6 August 2012 14:14, Richard Hipp wrote:
> It has been a long time since we have done an official release of Fossil
> with prebuilt binaries. We should probably do another soon. Any
> objections to making the tip of trunk the next official release (version
> 1.23)?
Given that next to nobody
It has been a long time since we have done an official release of Fossil
with prebuilt binaries. We should probably do another soon. Any
objections to making the tip of trunk the next official release (version
1.23)?
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
