Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

Actually it's not clear what revert does. I removed the file and revert didn't recover it. I created an empty file and revert didn't recover it. (But maybe this is timestamp related, or because I'm on the machine that created the uv file in the first place.) Thanks ../Dave On 14 June 2017 at

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

`fossil uv list` doesn't mention any path information. Does it have path information behind the scenes so that `fossil uv revert` can put the file in the original place? Is there a way to find if any unversioned file has been updated apart from looking at the hash or the date for particular

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

I finally got around to this, but I got the following errors on Linux: : ~/Sites/p4ru/kitPJS ; fossil unversioned revert Usage: fossil sync URL : ~/Sites/p4ru/kitPJS ; fossil ver This is fossil version 2.2 [81d7d3f43e] 2017-04-11 20:54:55 UTC : ~/Sites/p4ru/kitPJS ; fossil unversioned list

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

Great, I'll give that a try. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 5/10/17, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > > Cool, > > Does this behave identically if I have: > > http://localhost:8082/setup_settings > > [±] autosync //<-- ON or OFF?

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

On 5/10/17, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > Cool, > Does this behave identically if I have: > http://localhost:8082/setup_settings > [±] autosync //<-- ON or OFF? > Yes. Unversioned content does not autosync. You have to explicitly runt "fossil uv sync". -- D. Richard

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

Cool, Does this behave identically if I have: http://localhost:8082/setup_settings [±] autosync //<-- ON or OFF? Thanks. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:34 AM, David Mason wrote: > Perfect! I knew it would be easy. > > Thanks > > On 10 May 2017 at 07:04, Richard Hipp

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

Perfect! I knew it would be easy. Thanks On 10 May 2017 at 07:04, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 5/10/17, David Mason wrote: > > I have a fossil repo and in it I have a file foo.js that is generated by > my > > build process - so I don't want it versioned. But I

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

On 5/10/17, David Mason wrote: > I have a fossil repo and in it I have a file foo.js that is generated by my > build process - so I don't want it versioned. But I *do* want it > distributed, and want it referencable from foo.html - which *is* versioned. > foo.html and foo.js

[fossil-users] Unversioned content for distribution

I have a fossil repo and in it I have a file foo.js that is generated by my build process - so I don't want it versioned. But I *do* want it distributed, and want it referencable from foo.html - which *is* versioned. foo.html and foo.js are *not* served by fossil, but by a simple apache or nginx