On 13 Jul 2011, Martin Gagnon wrote:
There's no a big issue here.. it's just a kind of philosophical question.
I've notice that autosetup ./configure will create a GNUmakefile instead
of a Makefile. In my OpenBSD system, bsd make doesn't use the GNUMake file
when I type make. So if I type:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote:
If I run the ./configure script, Solaris make (which isn't GNU make) will
ignore GNUmakefile and build a broken binary again!
The maintainer of GNU Make, Paul Smith, writes (and i agree with him
wholeheartedly, after
On 14/07/2011, at 7:03 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote:
If I run the ./configure script, Solaris make (which isn't GNU make) will
ignore GNUmakefile and build a broken binary again!
The maintainer of GNU Make, Paul Smith,
On 14 Jul 2011, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote:
If I run the ./configure script, Solaris make (which isn't GNU make) will
ignore GNUmakefile and build a broken binary again!
The maintainer of GNU Make, Paul Smith, writes (and
There's no a big issue here.. it's just a kind of philosophical question.
I've notice that autosetup ./configure will create a GNUmakefile instead
of a Makefile. In my OpenBSD system, bsd make doesn't use the GNUMake file
when I type make. So if I type:
# ./configure
# make
It will use the
5 matches
Mail list logo