Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-07 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/2/6 Stephan Beal : > Fossil doesn't do any special > interpretation of content other than to complain/warn if a file contains > Windows-style newlines. (The newer UTF-related code has a similar check for > invalid UTF, i believe.) Currently, fossil only gives a warning when it encounters CR/N

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Well, it is easier than that since I review the diffs in winmerge and 90% of the time I can ignore all diffs and commit. And what does trickle through sticks out quite nicely. Being a small development team, I only use a few fossil cmds and in a tight flow. fcom=fossil commit --user me fpull=fossil

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread Themba Fletcher
What about setting up diff-command to suit, then exporting the diff to a patch file, fossil revert and then apply the patch? On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:25 AM, wrote: > Yes, I definitely have mixes of meaningful and non-meaningful [white > space, case sensitive, empty lines] diffs to review. > Whi

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Yes, I definitely have mixes of meaningful and non-meaningful [white space, case sensitive, empty lines] diffs to review. While I would love to 'one-tool it' with fossil's diff tech, I find it way easier to pop into winmerge and all its ignore goodies. Maybe I'm too optimistic to expect that much p

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread Themba Fletcher
So sounds like the problem you're trying to solve is that * you have lots of *real* changes to a set of files * most of those changes are meaningless in your environment * so you're trying to separate the signal from the noise. You can use fossil set diff-command 'diff -iw' to ignore case on the d

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Well, I agree, but the diff tools I use always have an 'ignore case' option. Seems logical to me that would be an option in fossil also. Unless text vs binary file assignments are super difficult? While I prefer to seek the root of a problem, I cannot guarantee syntax highlighting of source code.

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:20 AM, wrote: > > The problem arises from code edits without syntax highlighting. > So 'PI2' might be 'pi2' and fossil traps this as a diff. > Because it is a diff. 'p' and 'P' might mean the same thing in some contexts, but that does not mean they are themselves the s

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Ok, Added a feature request after not finding similar request: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview/c6afac6dee54d6658e66ed7b7ad8d5b18bd899a1 Thanks for fossil! On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:20 PM, wrote: >> >> Oh wow! Didn't realize ther

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:20 PM, wrote: > Oh wow! Didn't realize there was no global case-insensitive setting > for file contents? > The problem arises from code edits without syntax highlighting. > So 'PI2' might be 'pi2' and fossil traps this as a diff. > There isn't one - that was a misunderst

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread sky5walk
Oh wow! Didn't realize there was no global case-insensitive setting for file contents? The problem arises from code edits without syntax highlighting. So 'PI2' might be 'pi2' and fossil traps this as a diff. Where do I edit globs for file contents? "...with that possibility in mind, e.g. *.[fF][oO]

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-06 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Themba Fletcher wrote: > It sounds like you're reporting that the file *contents* differ in > case as opposed to the file names. If that's your report -- the > case-sensitive flag only affects the file name comparisons: > A related point: the various glob settings

Re: [fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-05 Thread Themba Fletcher
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, wrote: > Hi, > I noticed I am getting simple case sensitive differences despite > having [ ] case-sensitive unchecked in local and remote repos? > Anything else I need to do? It sounds like you're reporting that the file *contents* differ in case as opposed to the

[fossil-users] casE-senSitive?

2013-02-05 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I noticed I am getting simple case sensitive differences despite having [ ] case-sensitive unchecked in local and remote repos? Anything else I need to do? fossil version 1.25 [80bf94e0f7] 2013-01-18 21:34:21 UTC Thanks for fossil! ___ fossil-users m

Re: [fossil-users] case-sensitive vs ignore-glob

2012-12-22 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > i _think_ you could achieve what you're looking for by changing the glob to: > > *.[zZ][iI][pP],*.[pP][dD][fF],*.[hH][tT][mM]* Yes, or simply use *.htm*,*.HTM*, because it's really unusual to have mixed case extensions (at least in my setup)

Re: [fossil-users] case-sensitive vs ignore-glob

2012-12-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > C:\work> fossil set ignore-glob > ignore-glob (local) *.zip,*.pdf,*.htm* > i _think_ you could achieve what you're looking for by changing the glob to: *.[zZ][iI][pP],*.[pP][dD][fF],*.[hH][tT][mM]* Tedious, yes, but AFA

[fossil-users] case-sensitive vs ignore-glob

2012-12-18 Thread Juanma Barranquero
Hi. It is a bug, or by design, that the ignore-glob does not honor the setting of case-sensitive? I haven't set case-sensitive, which means that on Windows defaults to false. Then: C:\work> fossil set ignore-glob ignore-glob (local) *.zip,*.pdf,*.htm* C:\work> fossil extras o