On 27 Jul 2010, at 11:37, Zed wrote: > But again, none of this matters for my point. I'm not talking about > wiki, I'm talking about HTML documentation. If there was a way to > generate HTML using any of the many docs generators out there, and then > check it into fossil so that fossil styles it, then you could use > whatever wiki format you wanted. It would future proof and satisfy all > the whiners.
Is it not sufficient to simply have a link in the the existing wiki to the generated documentation? The site wouldn't have a single style then though… are there other drawbacks? -- benj...@fysh.org - Twitter @benjohnbarnes - Skype benjohnbarnes - Mobile +44 (0) 7968 851 636 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
