Re: [fossil-users] fossil dbstat vs /stat

2015-02-25 Thread jungle Boogie
Hi Stephan, On 24 February 2015 at 18:29, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i.e. CLI vs WWW. @Jungle, some of those differences are expected (or not unexpected), by the way, namely the Database Stats. Sorry to have mislead this and made it difficult to follow! Yes, I meant my

Re: [fossil-users] fossil dbstat vs /stat

2015-02-24 Thread jungle Boogie
Hi Stephan, On Feb 24, 2015 5:47 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:32 AM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Are these two supposed to match? should the compression ratio be the same for my clone vs, website report? They should be identical -

[fossil-users] fossil dbstat vs /stat

2015-02-24 Thread jungle Boogie
Hello All, Se we have this command: https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/help?cmd=dbstat And this for web UI: https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/help?cmd=/stat Fossil repo stats: https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/stat Are these two supposed to match? should the compression ratio be the same for my

Re: [fossil-users] fossil dbstat vs /stat

2015-02-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:32 AM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Are these two supposed to match? should the compression ratio be the same for my clone vs, website report? They should be identical - the CLI command was initially derived from the /stats page. It is possible that

Re: [fossil-users] fossil dbstat vs /stat

2015-02-24 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:47:24AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:32 AM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Are these two supposed to match? should the compression ratio be the same for my clone vs, website report? They should be

Re: [fossil-users] fossil dbstat vs /stat

2015-02-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:47:24AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:32 AM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Are these two supposed to match? should the compression ratio be