ers-
>> boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Remigiusz Modrzejewski
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:12 AM
>> To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
>> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] server SSL support
>>
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 15:09 , ST wrote:
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-
> boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Remigiusz Modrzejewski
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:12 AM
> To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
> Subject: Re: [fossil-us
On 11/13/2012 03:12 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 15:09 , ST wrote:
why not put it inside in order not to bother with 3rd party stuff?
To keep the core small?
Also, safer. TLS is a bag of vulnerabilities waiting for a chance* to
get out; better to keep it closed, in
On Nov 13, 2012, at 15:09 , ST wrote:
> why not put it inside in order not to bother with 3rd party stuff?
To keep the core small?
Kind regards,
Remigiusz Modrzejewski
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fo
why not put it inside in order not to bother with 3rd party stuff?
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 15:01 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:05:17PM +0200, ST wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could you, please, implement built-in SSL support in fossil server? This
> > will make collaboratio
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:05:17PM +0200, ST wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you, please, implement built-in SSL support in fossil server? This
> will make collaboration easier, since there will be no need to
> configure/run a separate webserver...
You can use stunnel or other wrappers easily.
Joerg
Hi,
could you, please, implement built-in SSL support in fossil server? This
will make collaboration easier, since there will be no need to
configure/run a separate webserver...
Thank you,
ST
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.
7 matches
Mail list logo