Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Joe Mistachkin on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:43:15 -0700: Works great. I made a couple style tweaks, including adding some CSS and moving the new elements out one level. I'm not sure if my CSS is the best choice, please feel free to enhance the styling. Looks fine here. I sometimes

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Stephan Beal
The first impl used whatever order the checkboxes are in, but that was even less readable. One simple solution, i think, would be to keep the sorting but underline the most recently selected letter. Will try that when i get home. - stephan Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Or perhaps instead each Capability should have it's letter next to it? (s) Setup(u) Reader (r) Read Ticket (a) Admin(v) Developer(n) New Tickets (d) Delete (g) Clone(c) Append

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:32:06 +0200: Here's a screenshot showing a partial implementation, with a couple different placement options. i'm not happy with any of them :/. I actually did try to update it myself last night but had alignment issues due to the font on

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: I actually did try to update it myself last night but had alignment issues due to the font on the (s) letter not being a fixed font. i didn't even consider the font width - excellent point.

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Scott Robison
On Sep 30, 2014 9:57 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: I actually did try to update it myself last night but had alignment issues due to the font on the (s) letter not being a fixed font. i

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: On Sep 30, 2014 9:57 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i didn't even consider the font width - excellent point. {snipped} Sorry for opening this huge can of worms! :) i lay the blame squarely on

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Scott Robison on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:04:29 -0600: Sorry for opening this huge can of worms! :) Haha, don't sweat it. I've actually wished for some improvements to the permission checkbox page for a while. I've always found it annoying that the letters are not displayed when

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-30 Thread Stephan Beal
That is close to what i do for initial prototypes - develop in the chrome dev tools console, injecting the code into the page, but at some point it has to get integrated. (sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed - please excuse brevity, typos, and top-posting) - stephan beal

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-29 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: On Sep 28, 2014 12:49 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Sidenote: i'm curious why most people prefer postscript addition, when prefix is never slower and sometimes faster. (Not that it matters one

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-28 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Works great. I made a couple style tweaks, including adding some CSS and moving the new elements out one level. I'm not sure if my CSS is the best choice, please feel free to enhance the styling. Looks good to

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-28 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: In JS there are only 2 scopes: global and local function scope, so that (var e) behaves as if it's declared outside of the for loop, whether or not it really is. Kinda silly, i know. Had to go clarify that for my own

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-28 Thread Scott Robison
On Sep 28, 2014 12:49 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Sidenote: i'm curious why most people prefer postscript addition, when prefix is never slower and sometimes faster. (Not that it matters one iota for a case like this, it just seems to be very deeply embedded in most people i

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-28 Thread Will Parsons
Scott Robison wrote: --===0702352335== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044286d854da5a05042007d5 --f46d044286d854da5a05042007d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sep 28, 2014 12:49 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Sidenote: i'm curious

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed improvement to inheritedprivilegessubscripts.

2014-09-27 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Stephan Beal wrote: Please try this out: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=inherit-priv-mark-sub Works great. I made a couple style tweaks, including adding some CSS and moving the new elements out one level. I'm not sure if my CSS is the best choice, please feel free to