On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:51:11 +0300, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
First of all, thank you Thomas (and you Richard!) for such a nice feature.
Regarding name of the command I'm agree 'service' and 'server' commands
are confusing, since theya re very close by meanings. However, I don't
On 19.07.2011 06:16, Jeremy Anderson wrote:
Other platforms could either re-direct it (e.g., fossil service becomes an
alias for fossil server), or just print a message saying that the command
is only valid for Windows operating systems.
On non Windows platforms, fossil service prints the
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jeremy Anderson jere...@gmail.com wrote:
I currently host fossil server as a window service via NSSM. fossil
service gets my vote. simple to the point.
i would argue for the win prefix because 'service' is used on other
platforms as well, e.g. Solaris SMF
Why not make an option e.g.
fossil server -service?
--
Rene
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Why not make an option e.g.
fossil server -service?
+1 :)
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
___
fossil-users mailing list
On 19.07.2011 15:42, Rene wrote:
Why not make an option e.g.
fossil server -service?
because the service command consists of several sub-commands?
--
tsbg
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
To quote Donald Knuth: the root of all evil is premature optimization.
Is service really that confusing? imho service is the term that windows
users would be most familiar with; perhaps it can be given a try first
before being rejected as confusing. If it doesn't work out, perhaps svc is
a
On 7/19/2011 11:27 AM, Paul wrote:
Is service really that confusing?
I'm more concerned that `fossil serv` becomes ambiguous. (fossil allows
unambiguous short versions of all its commands.)
--
Joshua Paine
LetterBlock: Web Applications Built With Joy
http://letterblock.com/
301-576-1920
To quote Donald Knuth: the root of all evil is premature optimization.
Although the quote is nice and applicable to many situations, I
think that this is absolutely not the case.
The problem is not to make a type of optimization, the problem is
that it is necessary to make a decision
On 19.07.2011 17:47, Ramon Ribó wrote:
In my opinion, the name service is too generic and too windows
specific. Fossil can give us a lot of services, apart from using the
Windows services feature.
I agree with another poster that a good solution could be to make it
a subcommand of server.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Schnurrenberger t...@gmx.net wrote:
It is probably better to change the command-name from service
to e.g. winsvc
+1 vote for winsvc/winserve/winservice (no hyphen)
___
fossil-users mailing list
I vote for
fossil server --service
or something similar.
-Original Message-
From: Wes Freeman
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:18 PM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Schnurrenberger t
fossil server ?-P|--port TCPPORT? ?--service-install?
?--service-remove? ?REPOSITORY?
I don't think that this a good idea because the service command
has several sub-commands.
It is probably better to change the command-name from service
to e.g. winsvc
Althouth winsvc could also be a good
Just read through the code. Got a few comments:
These errors:
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much arguments for delete method.);
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much arguments for show method.);
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much arguments for create method.);
if( g.argc4 ) fossil_fatal(to much
On 19.07.2011 18:36, Ramon Ribó wrote:
Althouth winsvc could also be a good solution, what other sub commands,
appart
from install and remove do you really need?
You don't need the service command at all. There are command line
utilities and/or GUI's in the Windows OS which have the required
The fossil service command is a convenience command for Windows users
who
are not system administrators. It concentrates the necessary functionality
where it
is needed
I agree with it. So my proposal was to add the minimal functionality to the
command:
fossil server --install-service
fossil
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
something more distinctive? Perhaps fossil wservice or fossil
win-serve. Other ideas?
i'd prefer win-service, but i don't use windows so i don't get a vote.
or maybe:
fossil M$ervice
;)
--
- stephan beal
: Ron Wilson
Sent: 07/19/11 04:03 AM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
something
or run-time)
for non-windows platforms.
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wilson
Sent: 07/19/11 04:03 AM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The fossil service command
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Mon
19 matches
Mail list logo