On Oct 6, 2014 12:26 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, all,
(This just happened...)
The autosync option provides (incidentally, not specifically by design) a
feature one doesn't have if it is turned off: the ability to abort a commit
within a small (and unknown/varying) time
Bah! Commit not conmit. Stupid phone keyboard.
On Oct 6, 2014 12:39 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote:
On Oct 6, 2014 12:26 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, all,
(This just happened...)
The autosync option provides (incidentally, not specifically by
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
I have that functionality without auto sync. I don't use the -m comment
option so I get a text editor showing me what has changed before I type the
message. If I decide I need to not commit, I don't enter a message
I just wanted to give you a little grief based on past -m comments. :)
On Oct 6, 2014 12:42 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
I have that functionality without auto sync. I don't use the -m comment
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
I have that functionality without auto sync. I don't use the -m comment
option so I get a text editor showing me what has changed before I
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. I seem to recall you extolling the virtues of command line editing. :)
Touché!
(That's a word we don't get to use nearly enough in everyday speech!)
I confess I didn't think if this an a reason to use an actual editor.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
I just wanted to give you a little grief based on past -m comments. :)
LOL! i expected you might be, but wasn't sure if you had arrived on the
list the last time that topic came up. But seriously, though, your
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
But seriously, though, your argument is a good reason not to use -m and
rely on $EDITOR instead. i think my problem is that i regularly use 2
(sometimes 3) SCMs, namely fossil, svn, and (sometimes) git, often over a
Thus said Stephan Beal on Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:25:55 +0200:
The autosync option provides (incidentally, not specifically by
design) a feature one doesn't have if it is turned off: the ability to
abort a commit within a small (and unknown/varying) time frame.
joke
Perhaps there should be
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org
wrote:
Thus said Stephan Beal on Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:25:55 +0200:
The autosync option provides (incidentally, not specifically by
design) a feature one doesn't have if it is turned off: the ability to
abort a
On 06/10/14 19:41, Scott Robison wrote:
Bah! Commit not conmit. Stupid phone keyboard.
On Oct 6, 2014 12:39 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
mailto:sc...@casaderobison.com wrote:
On Oct 6, 2014 12:26 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
mailto:sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 6 October 2014 15:05, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
good reason not to use -m and rely on $EDITOR instead. i think my problem is
that i regularly use 2 (sometimes 3) SCMs, namely fossil, svn, and
(sometimes) git, often over a remote connection on systems with no emacs
installed
The problem is access - i don't have root access on most systems, and many
others don't have compilers, or have quota limitations, weird/old OS
versions, etc. So -m, which works the same in all environments, has become
what my fingers just do without having to be told.
- stephan
Sent from a
13 matches
Mail list logo
