Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

at you've done) Best Regards K. [1] For the record : 4. What Is A "Bikeshed"? NOT bikeshed.org. De : Luca Ferrari À : Fossil SCM user's discussion Envoyé le : Vendredi 28 octobre 2016 6h29 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd On

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:42 AM, K. Fossil user wrote: > Hi, > >> « » > > I don't click in any links that are not known... Right approach! After all, all computer people have never heard about Bike Shed...especially those tied to FreeBSD... You have to learn a lot of stuff.

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

Hi, > « » I don't click in any links that are not known... > « Since in this mailing list I believe there are "experts", excluding me, I > would like you to understand that writing something like » ... like ... is ... ? is what please ? Your sentence is not clear ! You

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

Allow me to elaborate a little more, hope this will make you stop posting like in the previous days. On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:30 AM, K. Fossil user wrote: > a) I have nothing to ask at this time, so I don't even need to learn how to > [ask] > b) Someone who have somethin

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

Mr. User (if that is indeed your name): On 10/26/2016 4:30 PM, K. Fossil user wrote: In this mailing list we need to know everything about fossil and fossil related stuffs. - inetd/xinetd etc. that may be used in conjonction with Fossil (may be I am the only one who hear about a daemon (inetd)

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

k ! :-)Wake up man ! :-D Best Regards K. De : Luca Ferrari À : Fossil SCM user's discussion Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 octobre 2016 6h25 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:02 AM, K. Fossil user wrote: > For example, today

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:02 AM, K. Fossil user wrote: > For example, today I've learned that Luca is not aware about security like > 90% of Windows normal users... And still you don't learn what to ask on the right mailing list. Stop trolling. ___ foss

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

Hi, >« Oh, I thought we were on fossil-users here... » Many people are interested in security talks, but not you. You are so good in this area, aren't you ? When it comes to servers, especially TCP/IP things, one should consider security seriously. People will talk again to you the day when a se

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:35 AM, K. Fossil user wrote: > a) I don't talk about Fossil. My talk is about inetd/xinetd issue when it > comes to security. Oh, I thought we were on fossil-users here... > You really want to know what an expert in computers security said to us ? > "Never use xinetd or

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

Hi, Thanks to Joerg who give some nice perspective about software. Thank to Warren which tries to talk. Warren said : >« I just did a search for inetd at the NVD CVE search, and got nothing >relevant to running Fossil under inetd » a) I don't talk about Fossil. My talk is about inetd/xinetd iss

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:36:23PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 24, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:56:45AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > >> The only common exception is this recent trend of replacing old, > >> bloated software that grew organi

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

On Oct 24, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:56:45AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >> The only common exception is this recent trend of replacing old, >> bloated software that grew organically over decades with well-focused >> fresh alternatives. (e.g. BIND

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:56:45AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > The only common exception is this recent trend of replacing old, > bloated software that grew organically over decades with well-focused > fresh alternatives. (e.g. BIND vs nsd/unbound, LibreSSL vs OpenSSL, > Postfix vs Sendmail, etc.

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

On Oct 22, 2016, at 3:23 PM, K. Fossil user wrote: > > 1/ As I've stated in the past according to people I do know, for security > reason, inetd/xinetd is not recommended. I just did a search for inetd at the NVD CVE search, and got nothing relevant to running Fossil under inetd: https://