Re: [fossil-users] X-Frame-Options http header

2011-08-10 Thread Ben Summers
On 9 Aug 2011, at 22:14, Martin S. Weber wrote: So I wanted to use javadoc/scaladoc style documentation and take advantage of fossils embedded documentation -- I put the scaladoc under repo/docco and happily was going to http://server:port/repo/doc/trunk/docco/index.html - but there

Re: [fossil-users] X-Frame-Options http header

2011-08-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote: It sounds like the default should change, and those who really care should adjust their web server. Just FYI: the vast majority of users do not have admin-level rights to their publicly-hosted servers. i.e. fossil changes

Re: [fossil-users] X-Frame-Options http header

2011-08-10 Thread Ben Summers
On 10 Aug 2011, at 15:11, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote: It sounds like the default should change, and those who really care should adjust their web server. Just FYI: the vast majority of users do not have admin-level rights to

Re: [fossil-users] X-Frame-Options http header

2011-08-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote: Yes, that was why I suggested changing the default to something which caused minimal problems. The paranoid will probably be running their own servers anyway. In any case, the DENY setting only affected those doing

Re: [fossil-users] X-Frame-Options http header

2011-08-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Sorry, i didn't mean to imply that such a change _would_ break my setup (i had never even heard of that header until this thread!) And a side note: HTML5 deprecates frames altogether (but not iframe), by the way. --