Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

2016-10-16 Thread Steve Bennett
> On 15 Oct 2016, at 2:01 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is FYI suggestion to make compatibility of autosetup to support the > system expecting typical autoconf/automake options while not killing > nice option checking feature of autosetup via

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

2016-10-15 Thread K. Fossil user
nd I agree with that.   Best Regards K. De : Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Samedi 15 octobre 2016 23h02 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 01:01:17PM +0900,

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

2016-10-15 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 01:01:17PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > As I see output of "./configure --help" on autoconf/automake based code, > I see the following: > > --enable-silent-rules less verbose build output (undo: "make V=1") > --disable-silent-rules verbose build output (undo: "make

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

2016-10-15 Thread K. Fossil user
Hi, The good question is : Why don't they use autoconf/automake like most people do, at least CMake even if I don't agree with this ? Snobism ? :-P (LOL)   Best Regards K. De : Osamu Aoki À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Samedi 15 octobre 2016