Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit : Answering the question about breaking existing scripts, the output is identical when used at the root. Unless you're running scripts in a sub-directory, nothing

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-22 Thread Ben Summers
On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit : Answering the question about breaking existing scripts, the output is identical when used at the root. Unless

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote: On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit : Answering the question about breaking

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-22 Thread Ben Summers
On 22 Jul 2011, at 13:09, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote: On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote: I've implemented this in a branch: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/e0d2e1f9b8 Does this sound like a good idea? amen! -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-10 Thread Nolan Darilek
Hmm, maybe just --all/-a? show --show-all seems a bit redundant. Otherwise, I won't bikeshed, and that does seem like a good idea. On 07/10/2011 08:11 AM, Ben Summers wrote: When working on my project, the current directory is always a sub-directory of the checkout root. Perhaps I'm too used

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-10 Thread Martin Gagnon
Le 2011-07-10 à 09:11, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit : When working on my project, the current directory is always a sub-directory of the checkout root. Perhaps I'm too used to subversion, but I'm finding the checkout root-relative listing rather confusing. You can't copy and paste

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-10 Thread Joshua Paine
On 7/10/2011 9:11 AM, Ben Summers wrote: $ fossil status In sub-directory two: ADDED world.txt EDITED src/display.c 1 other change. Use --show-all option to list all changes. I would rather it work like git and show other changes as well, but relative to the current location. E.g.,

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-10 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:12:33AM -0400, Joshua Paine wrote: On 7/10/2011 9:11 AM, Ben Summers wrote: $ fossil status In sub-directory two: ADDED world.txt EDITED src/display.c 1 other change. Use --show-all option to list all changes. I would rather it work like git and

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-10 Thread Martin Gagnon
Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit : Answering the question about breaking existing scripts, the output is identical when used at the root. Unless you're running scripts in a sub-directory, nothing needs to change. Ben That's true... And I like the latest