On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, wrote:
> Fine, but I don’t think this would require a multi-level undo stack. A
> simple flag to indicate at the
>
No, it wouldn't require much actual effort, it just requires that revert
check for changes before trying to revert.
completion of any command if
is. No
time-consuming checks would be needed, IMO, if setting of the flag is placed in
the correct places.
From: Stephan Beal
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:35 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] undo option unavailable even when nothing changed
On Sat, A
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:18 PM, wrote:
> This does not seem to be right. Because if by mistake you type “f rev”
> twice (not being sure if you’ve already done it) you lose the ability to
> undo.
>
A multi-level undo stack has been on the wish-list for a while but has
never been implemented.
3 matches
Mail list logo
