On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:36:41 +0200, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
is there a way to make 'fossil clone' a bit less verbose for use in
scripts? I am using clone to make a consistent temporary copy of a
repo.
Ideas are welcome,
what about something like
fossil clone
right, something like that would work, I guess...
Thanks,
Michai
On 4 June 2014 10:44, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:36:41 +0200, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
is there a way to make 'fossil clone' a bit less verbose for use in
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org
wrote:
Thus said Andy Bradford on Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:59:21 -0600:
Does the Q-card here not imply any relation with c14a4a93d5a3 which will
be picked up in trunk?
It seems I did not understand this very well:
A
Hello,
perhaps a quick question: is it possible to diff a file in the current
checkout against a previous version of itself, regardless of how long
ago the last change occurred?
(diff --from prev --to current does not always work, in case the file
was changed some checkins ago)
Of course using
On 4 June 2014 15:12, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
perhaps a quick question: is it possible to diff a file in the current
checkout against a previous version of itself, regardless of how long
ago the
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 4 June 2014 15:12, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
perhaps a quick question: is it possible to diff a file in the
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
I don't recall implementing anything to do that from the command-line.
But on the other hand, there is a lot of stuff in Fossil that others have
implemented and a lot of stuff that I implemented but then forgot about.
i
On 4 June 2014 15:51, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 03:21:10PM +0200, Michai Ramakers wrote:
On 4 June 2014 15:12, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
perhaps a quick
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
You're mixing things up :) Rebase is just a script around new branch
starting at given base, cherry-pick all the commits from the base to
the head of what's being rebased. It's a script, literally. It
can't break
Hi, all!
i just got an ODROID-U3 device and i'm now looking for a fossil binary...
does one of you have a link to a Fossil binary for Android running on an
ARM9 processor?
ODroid:
http://hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php
Many thanks in advance!
--
- stephan beal
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, all!
i just got an ODROID-U3 device and i'm now looking for a fossil binary...
does one of you have a link to a Fossil binary for Android running on an
ARM9 processor?
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil-beagle.gz
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
Hi, all!
i just got an ODROID-U3 device and i'm now looking for a fossil binary...
does one of you have a link to a Fossil binary for Android running on an ARM9
processor?
ODroid:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi, all!
i just got an ODROID-U3 device and i'm now looking for a fossil binary...
does one of you have a link to a Fossil binary for Android
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 05:37:21PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi, all!
i just got an ODROID-U3 device and i'm now
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
You're mixing things up :) Rebase is just a script around new branch
starting at given base, cherry-pick all the commits from the base to
the
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
bookmarks that are very similar to git branches. Since a bookmark
is just a
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
f merge bk:trunk
typo, but you get the idea.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
those who insist
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_-jB7mK7jpXUUZKQW5vcEFnRkE/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks!
i just got it compiled on Xubuntu 13.10 on the ODroid. Running from a
MicroSD (as opposed to eMMC, because Android is on my eMMC chip),
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Right, the index is a very light-weight mechanism for giving the user
power in deciding what to commit. I.e., more fine-grained control
than choose what files to commit.
My view is that the Git staging area (I
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
-bch
On 6/4/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:53 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
Here's something that you get for free with Fossil's model that
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:53 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
i envision them as being lightweight, i.e. local, non-versioned.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:53 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax
Because the internet can be a poor medium to express emotional intent,
let me preface this with: Stephan, you know I have the utmost respect
for your coding chops, and we _mostly_ fall in line wrt design
philosophy. That said:
I'm shaking my head, wondering why? My current mental image is:
sb fossil bk add xp experimental:2011-06-04
I can imagine this being useful at least occasionally. I'm still
loathe to include it in core fossil, but it'd be a great task for a
little tool.
-bch
On 6/4/14, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Because the internet can be a poor medium to
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:21 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
sb fossil bk add xp experimental:2011-06-04
I can imagine this being useful at least occasionally. I'm still
loathe to include it in core fossil, but it'd be a great task for a
little tool.
In the core, basically the
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Bookmarks. That's a nice idea, actually. Added to my TODO list.
i
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
To be truly useful it has to be possible to [selectively] push/pull
bookmarks.
If that's the case then they really provide no benefits over propagating
tags (which are versioned), but note that Fossil cannot
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
In git, tags and branches are both very light-weight bookmark-like
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
In the core, basically the only addition would be adding another block to
symbolic_name_to_rid(), which simply expands the ... part from bk:...
from the bookmark list, then runs that result through through
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:47:43 -0400:
The merge logic in Fossil recognizes when the same exact change is
merged more than once and avoids conflicts in that case. The Q-cards
are not necessary for this.
What am I doing wrong then? In this case, I did a
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org
wrote:
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:47:43 -0400:
The merge logic in Fossil recognizes when the same exact change is
merged more than once and avoids conflicts in that case. The Q-cards
are not
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
To be truly useful it has to be possible to [selectively] push/pull
bookmarks.
If that's the case then they really provide no benefits over
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
- when you checkout a tag and then commit something, the tag doesn't
move with the HEAD of your workspace -- you're in detached HEAD mode
when you checkout a tag
- when you checkout a branch and you commit
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Right, the index is a very light-weight mechanism for giving the user
power in deciding what to commit. I.e., more fine-grained control
than choose
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
To be truly useful it has to be possible to [selectively]
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:34:31 -0400:
It clearly would not work for me.
As as an amateur user of Git, Git wasn't working for me---perhaps this
is simply due to misunderstanding ``core'' features of Git. At any rate,
thanks to Git I discovered Fossil and have been pleased
Nico Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Bealsgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williamsn...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
bookmarks that are very similar to git branches. Since a
Scott Robison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Joel Bruick j...@joelface.com
mailto:j...@joelface.com wrote:
I think Git is a great, powerful, and flexible tool that actually
has a much simpler design than it initially appears. But to get to
a place where you actually
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Joel Bruick j...@joelface.com wrote:
Consider it yours.
Thanks. Final form:
OH: To understand Git's design takes 99x more effort than 99% of software.
Once you get to that point it's wonderful! // Too true!
Curse the 140 character limit! :)
--
Scott Robison
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
I really want to steal this in tweet form:
To get to a place where you understand Git's design takes 99x more
effort than 99% of software. Once
Thus said Martin Gagnon on Fri, 30 May 2014 05:55:58 -0400:
Same for me, I always use autosync=1 together with the dont-push=1
setting for that. Look like an option got added by someone that didn't
know about the other.
The actually do serve different purposes. dont-push=1 prevents
Scott Robison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
mailto:d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Scott Robison
sc...@casaderobison.com mailto:sc...@casaderobison.com wrote:
I really want to steal this in tweet form:
To
On 6/4/2014 10:50, Richard Hipp wrote:
The staging area complicates the interface.
Perhaps you will add some of this to the Fossil vs Git wiki page.
(Section 3.4?)
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
I started to use fossil just today, but let me participate too :)
Everyday I have a list of tasks that I have to work on and when I finish, I
like to separate the changes of each task by commit.
To do that, I just open GUI, check the lines of the files that i want to
commit.
(Just like this
I've heard git allows this, and occasionally wished for it.
As it stands currently, it's not possible with fossil. There is a degree of
freedom in this regard using the fossil stash, though, which can be used
with some file jigging to separate two (or more?) logical ideas that one
wants committed
48 matches
Mail list logo
