[fossil-users] providing different commit time possible?

2015-08-27 Thread Josef Frank


Hello,

is it possible to specify a time/date string for fossil to be used for 
the current commit instead of current time?


E.g. in mercurial one could do hg ci -d '-mm-dd HH:MM:SS'

Background:
I have got a bunch of tgz/zip files that resemble snapshots of the 
respective source trees at particular time points and would like to use 
the date saved in the archives as check-in dates.


Best
jf

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] providing different commit time possible?

2015-08-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Josef Frank on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 01:01:52 +0200:

 is it possible to specify a time/date string for fossil to be used for
 the current commit instead of current time?

Yes, you can use the --date-override option for that.

It isn't documented, but it's there:

http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/431159485ee4209e6bfc7bd4481ff8a1c25a2626?txt=1ln=1700

Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 400055dfa0b9
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] providing different commit time possible?

2015-08-27 Thread Richard Hipp
On 8/27/15, Josef Frank josef.fr...@gmx.ch wrote:

 Hello,

 is it possible to specify a time/date string for fossil to be used for
 the current commit instead of current time?

 E.g. in mercurial one could do hg ci -d '-mm-dd HH:MM:SS'

There is an undocumented --date-override '-mm-dd HH:MM:SS' option.
-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil added to AstLinux

2015-08-27 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com
wrote:

 Fossil hit our radar, and we wondered if it could be used to track changes
 to these configuration files in a way a non-developer type could easily
 understand.

 Long story short, success, Fossil is a gem !


Good to hear.

Since any HTTPS access to /admin/fossil/ is authenticated by lighttpd, we
 set Fossil's nobody permissions to a (admin) and add the admin user
 for s (setup) permissions.


Why a and not d (developer)? Seems to me that would cover the needed
permissions to manager the Astrix and AstLinux conf files.


 (Yes SourceForge SVN, our project is over 10 years old, old habits die
 hard :-) )


FYI, chiselapp.com provides Fossil hosting for open source projects.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil added to AstLinux

2015-08-27 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Hi Ron,

On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:

 Since any HTTPS access to /admin/fossil/ is authenticated by lighttpd, we set 
 Fossil's nobody permissions to a (admin) and add the admin user for s 
 (setup) permissions.
 
 Why a and not d (developer)? Seems to me that would cover the needed 
 permissions to manager the Astrix and AstLinux conf files.

Since the user has lighttpd's admin privileges under the AstLinux web 
interface, it seemed reasonable to us that a privileges in Fossil would be 
appropriate.  Possibly we are allowing some privilege we really don't want, but 
in our testing things seemed appropriate.

If there is some reference describing the extra permissions of 'a' vs. 'dei' I 
would appreciate it.

Lonnie


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] SVN-fs-dump-format-version: 3 will produce unusable blobs

2015-08-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-08-26 20:16 GMT+02:00 Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com:
 I am sorry it took me so long to get to this. I don't know if it is still
 relevant for you, but I fixed this here:
 http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/24048eadf9247452

It will be relevant for someone.   Thanks!  Glad to know
that the problem is located and corrected.

Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users