Re: [fossil-users] Patch to not show files not added to repository in /doc/ckout

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:10 pm, "Michal Suchanek" wrote: > On 25 May 2010 19:59, Eric wrote: >> ... >> >> But ckout is only available if the server is running in a local checkout, >> otherwise it is silently converted to tip and what you see is the checked-in version. You don't see uncommitted

Re: [fossil-users] Patch to not show files not added to repository in /doc/ckout

On 25 May 2010 19:59, Eric wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Since fossil happily serves files not added to repository in >> /doc/ckout I fixed the issue locally to make /doc/ckout match /doc/tip >> after the changes are committed. >> >> The issue is reported as 0e5d75657f >> >> I do not understand the foss

Re: [fossil-users] Patch to not show files not added to repository in /doc/ckout

> Hello > > Since fossil happily serves files not added to repository in > /doc/ckout I fixed the issue locally to make /doc/ckout match /doc/tip > after the changes are committed. > > The issue is reported as 0e5d75657f > > I do not understand the fossil source well enough to make changes with >

[fossil-users] Patch to not show files not added to repository in /doc/ckout

Hello Since fossil happily serves files not added to repository in /doc/ckout I fixed the issue locally to make /doc/ckout match /doc/tip after the changes are committed. The issue is reported as 0e5d75657f I do not understand the fossil source well enough to make changes with confidence but sin

Re: [fossil-users] ignore list

On 5/25/2010 8:43 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:40 AM, > wrote: I am thinking about taking a stab at implementing an ignore-list feature similar to git's .gitignore to prevent pesky and unwanted files from making it into commits

Re: [fossil-users] ignore list

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:40 AM, wrote: > I am thinking about taking a stab at implementing an ignore-list feature > similar to git's .gitignore to prevent pesky and unwanted files from making > it into commits. If this feature already exists in Fossil I have overlooked > it. > > My initial plan

[fossil-users] ignore list

I am thinking about taking a stab at implementing an ignore-list feature similar to git's .gitignore to prevent pesky and unwanted files from making it into commits. If this feature already exists in Fossil I have overlooked it. My initial plan is to have a list of patterns contained within a

Re: [fossil-users] cgi.c

The debugging technique I normally use is to run the "fossil http" command directly from the debugger. The HTTP request can be either manually typed in, or redirected from a file. -- - D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-user

Re: [fossil-users] cgi.c

Hey, Thanks for the link. I eventually came around to the same technique in ddd, putting a sleep call in the function that the child executes, using ps to find the parent process id, and then attaching to the child with ddd. ___ fossil-users mailin

Re: [fossil-users] cgi.c

Hi! If you want to debug a child process then you have to tell gdb to do so. See this website: http://www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/gdb/gdb_26.html Ruediger Am Mittwoch 12 Mai 2010 17:41:00 schrieb zacht...@cis-partners.com: > I don't understand how the fossil web server is interacting with the ch