Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

Richard Hipp drh@... writes: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Francisc Simon francisc.si...@evalgo.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The only way, in Windows, that you can have a process started by a user continue running after logoff (i.e. what nohup does)

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Wolfgang wrote: I tried Dmitry Chestnykh's solution but i got some trouble, when the called process does subsequent 'system(...)'-calls - new DOS-boxes are flickering around. That was because I couldn't make it preserve input/output handles from the parent

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

Dmitry Chestnykh dmitry@... writes: On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Wolfgang wrote: I tried Dmitry Chestnykh's solution but i got some trouble, when the called process does subsequent 'system(...)'-calls - new DOS-boxes are flickering around. That was because I couldn't make it

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

Wolfgang ratwhs@... writes: Dmitry Chestnykh dmitry@... writes: On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Wolfgang wrote: I tried Dmitry Chestnykh's solution but i got some trouble, when the called process does subsequent 'system(...)'-calls - new DOS-boxes are flickering around.