Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on Hammer Principle

2011-03-30 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
On 03/24/11 20:29, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
 Cute. It seems pretty accurate. IMHO

http://twitter.com/DRMacIver/status/53029890634682369
http://twitter.com/DRMacIver/status/53030039134023680

*whistles innocently*

The pros and cons now at:

http://versioncontrol.hammerprinciple.com/items/fossil

...look quite fair, though. Pluggability and GUI tools are just a matter
of time, I reckon.

Suitability for large teams, without costing simplicity for small teams,
will require more thought. The first thought that comes to mind on that
point for me is git's support for dealing with shipping patches around,
which I think Zed posted about an approach to recently (importing
patches into your stash?); I'm not sure what would happen when the
person who wrote the patches then pulled from your repo after you'd
applied them, and tried to merge. rebase might end up sneaking into
the system via the back route.

 S.

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on Hammer Principle

2011-03-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:31:09AM -0400, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
 It doesn't have ClearCase!!! OMG
They may count only free VCS.

It lacks monotone though.

 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen De Gabrielle stephen.degabrie...@acm.org
 To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org 
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 Sent: Fri, Mar 25, 2011 1:59 am
 Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on Hammer Principle
 
 
 Cute. It seems pretty accurate. IMHOS.On Thursday, March 24, 2011, 
 Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote: Hello! Hammer 
 Principle is a whimsical site where people can rank contentious things 
 on various axes, and it then generates overall scores for stuff. They 
 added version control systems lately, and Fossil's one of them: 
 http://versioncontrol.hammerprinciple.com/ However, as of the time of 
 writing, only two people have expressed opinions on Fossil (and I'm 
 one of them). Let's fix that :-) Enjoy, ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym 
 http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ 
 ___ fossil-users mailing 
 list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org 
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users-- 
 --Stephen De Gabriellestephen.degabrielle@acm.orgTelephone +44 (0)20 
 85670911Mobile+44 (0)79 
 85189045http://www.degabrielle.name/stephen__
 _fossil-users mailing 
 listfossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.orghttp://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi
 -bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
   
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] build error, missing manifest.uuid

2011-03-30 Thread Zed A. Shaw
Uh, this may sound stupid but latest trunk fails with:

make: *** No rule to make target `src/../manifest.uuid', needed by
`bld/VERSION.h'.  Stop.

Because, for some reason, my checkout on this one machine does not have
a manifest.uuid.

Any idea why this might be happening?

-- 
Zed A. Shaw
http://zedshaw.com/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] build error, missing manifest.uuid

2011-03-30 Thread Mark Janssen
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Zed A. Shaw zeds...@zedshaw.com wrote:
 Uh, this may sound stupid but latest trunk fails with:

 make: *** No rule to make target `src/../manifest.uuid', needed by
 `bld/VERSION.h'.  Stop.

 Because, for some reason, my checkout on this one machine does not have
 a manifest.uuid.

 Any idea why this might be happening?

 --
 Zed A. Shaw
 http://zedshaw.com/
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Make sure the manifest repo setting is enabled. (fossil settings manifest on)

Mark
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] build error, missing manifest.uuid

2011-03-30 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Zed A. Shaw zeds...@zedshaw.com wrote:

 Uh, this may sound stupid but latest trunk fails with:

 make: *** No rule to make target `src/../manifest.uuid', needed by
 `bld/VERSION.h'.  Stop.

 Because, for some reason, my checkout on this one machine does not have
 a manifest.uuid.

 Any idea why this might be happening?



Run fossil setting manifest on to fix the problem.  Manifest generation
used to be on by default, but people complained so now it is off by
default.  When you clone a repository, it picks up the setting from the
clone.  But if you cloned yours before the default changed, you didn't get
the setting transferred, so you need to set it manually.

Both Fossil and SQLite use the manifest and manifest.uuid files to derive
their version numbers.  As far as I know, those are the only two projects
that do anything with manifest and manifest.uuid.



 --
 Zed A. Shaw
 http://zedshaw.com/
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users




-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] client certificates - next generation

2011-03-30 Thread Jan Danielsson
Hello,

   I reworked the client certificate management code, now it no longer
uses environment variables, and it's possible to specify the
certificate/key bundle name when calling clone/push/pull/sync.

   I'd like someone with a stronger sqlite-fu to look over some of my
queries (there aren't many of them, so it's not a huge task).

   I added a new table to the global database for storing certificates.
How would one best conditionally add this table?

   Apart from being highly untested and requiring some cleanup (removing
the old environment variable code, and possibly renaming certgroup to
certbundle) I believe the first phase of the client certificate
support code may be finished.

   All changes can be found in the branch jan-clientcert.

-- 
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] build error, missing manifest.uuid

2011-03-30 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
 Both Fossil and SQLite use the manifest and manifest.uuid files to derive
 their version numbers.  As far as I know, those are the only two projects
 that do anything with manifest and manifest.uuid.

For what it is worth, we would if/when we expand our use of Fossil to
source code management. We are still using git for that. We compile
the commit ID into our software (along with a prefix to indicate a
clean or muddy build). Before git, we used SVN and compiled in the
revision number. (Some people outside the software team have
complained about switching to the UUIDs instead of simple numbers, but
since we still use major and minor release numbers for official
releases, there is no risk of being forced back to using SVN.)
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] build error, missing manifest.uuid

2011-03-30 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 03/30/11 21:56, Ron Wilson wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
 Both Fossil and SQLite use the manifest and manifest.uuid files to derive
 their version numbers.  As far as I know, those are the only two projects
 that do anything with manifest and manifest.uuid.
 
 For what it is worth, we would if/when we expand our use of Fossil to
 source code management.
[---]

   Out of curiosity, what parts of fossil are you using -- if you're not
using the source code management?

   Is it the wiki or the ticket system? Or both?

-- 
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users