On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:24:28 -0700
Higham, Paul phig...@sjm.com wrote:
but I suspect that TH1 has neither dictionaries nor the {*} operator.
How about
set oneDlist
foreach pair $twoDlist {lappend oneDlist [lindex $pair 0]}
No foreach and lappend available either...
Paul
On 09:59 PM, Nathaniel R. Reindl wrote:
Is it necessary that it's autoconf? Or would you take a CMake-based build
script?
The GNU autotools have a lot of traction in the community, and a wide
variety of people are familiar with them. This makes a compelling
case alone for adopting the
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
If you have a way other than autoconf to generate a universal build script
that runs on any unix machine without special software installed, then that
will be fine. CMake does not qualify because it is not installed by
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa g...@atmarama.netwrote:
What about Python dependency? Is it acceptable?
Python is on my iMac and my Linux desktop. But it is not installed on the
OpenBSD 4.7 system that I use for testing. Perhaps in a few more years
Python will have
actually autoconf requires GNU M4, and somehow tends to bring automake
and libtool to your system as well.
2011/6/14 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa g...@atmarama.net
wrote:
What about Python dependency? Is it acceptable?
Python is on my
On Jun 14, 2011, at 13:37 , Richard Hipp wrote:
What about Python dependency? Is it acceptable?
Python is on my iMac and my Linux desktop. But it is not installed on the
OpenBSD 4.7 system that I use for testing. Perhaps in a few more years
Python will have become sufficiently universal
On Jun 14, 2011, at 13:45 , Alexander Vladimirov wrote:
actually autoconf requires GNU M4, and somehow tends to bring automake
and libtool to your system as well.
Yeah, that's for the developers. But users just need to run the Bourne shell
configure script.
Kind regards,
Remigiusz
On Jun 14, 2011, at 13:45 , Alexander Vladimirov wrote:
actually autoconf requires GNU M4, and somehow tends to bring automake
and libtool to your system as well.
Yeah, that's for the developers. But users just need to run the Bourne shell
configure script.
As an intermediate
2011-06-14 01:27 keltezéssel, Richard Hipp írta:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Steve Havelka smh...@gmail.com
mailto:smh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it necessary that it's autoconf? Or would you take a
CMake-based build script?
ccmake is not installed by default on either my iMac
On Jun 14, 2011, at 14:06 , Ben Summers wrote:
As an intermediate stage, a simple script to put the output of uname -s into
the Makefile might be a way to get going?
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=configure-make
autotools are a bit of a nightmare, and possibly overkill for
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:24:16AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
2011/6/2 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
What do you think about the problem? Do you understand it already, or you
would
really like a repository with the troubles, in order to start?
I'd have to recreate one
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Williams, Brian
bwilli...@informatica.comwrote:
Has anyone thrown themselves on this grenade yet?
If not, I can take a look at autoconf.
If you haven't already got any grey hairs then you'll have some soon.
Good luck!
--
- stephan beal
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Williams, Brian bwilli...@informatica.com
wrote:
Has anyone thrown themselves on this grenade yet?
If not, I can take a look at autoconf.
I got a chat message from someone who said they would take a look.
Surely the autoconf for Fossil won't be to hard?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Surely the autoconf for Fossil won't be to hard? All it needs to do is
check for a couple of libraries and set a few options based on --with-X
flags.
In my experience, it's not getting the project set up which is
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:27:49 -0400
Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Steve Havelka smh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it necessary that it's autoconf? Or would you take a CMake-based build
script?
ccmake is not installed by default on either my iMac nor my SuSE
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 05:42:49PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
Another suggestion nobody has made yet: jam. It can be distributed in
static-binary form directly with the source tree (i've seen this done in a
couple projects, and i know it can build on some rather obscure systems). i
can't
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:37:06 -0400
David Slocombe sloco...@vex.net wrote:
But autotools should come first as it both supports the above and
goes at least a long way to helping all the other folks who aren't
plugged into some Linux distribution's binary package system.
Is autotools the only
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:37 AM, dieter roelants dieter...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:24:28 -0700
Higham, Paul phig...@sjm.com wrote:
but I suspect that TH1 has neither dictionaries nor the {*} operator.
How about
set oneDlist
foreach pair $twoDlist {lappend
Stephan Beal wrote:
Another suggestion nobody has made yet: jam. It can be distributed in
static-binary form directly with the source tree (i've seen this done in a
couple projects, and i know it can build on some rather obscure systems). i
can't personally speak for jam's usability - read
All of these alternative build systems are a PITA on one system or another.
If it requires jam, cmake or anything that requires installing prerequisites
9 times out of 10 I won't even try that software unless there is a binary
install available somewhere or a pre-assembled Makefile.
I thought
20 matches
Mail list logo
