[fossil-users] Error: wrong project

2011-12-20 Thread bobefrei
Hello,

I have a fossil repository that I would like to put on chiselapp.com.

I cannot upload it because it is larger than 8M. Chiselapp website suggests to 
create a new project then push to it:

Limit 8M in size. If your repository is larger than this, create a new empty 
project and push to it instead.

When I try to push from my current local repository to new on chiselapp, I get 
this error:

Error: wrong project

Is there a way to push/pull/sync between unrelated repositories?


Thanks.


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Error: wrong project

2011-12-20 Thread Mark Janssen
There is a mismatch in the project-codes. Fortunately chiselapp
provides functionality to fix this. When creating the repository on
chiselapp override the project code with the project-code you get when
doing fossil info -R repository.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM,  bobef...@free.fr wrote:
 Hello,

 I have a fossil repository that I would like to put on chiselapp.com.

 I cannot upload it because it is larger than 8M. Chiselapp website suggests 
 to create a new project then push to it:

 Limit 8M in size. If your repository is larger than this, create a new empty 
 project and push to it instead.

 When I try to push from my current local repository to new on chiselapp, I 
 get this error:

 Error: wrong project

 Is there a way to push/pull/sync between unrelated repositories?


 Thanks.


 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Error: wrong project

2011-12-20 Thread James Turner
Just a quick reminder, please submit bug reports for chisel at [0]. I
don't always watch this list. Thanks.

[0] https://chiselapp.com/user/james/repository/chisel

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:05:26AM +0100, bobef...@free.fr wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have a fossil repository that I would like to put on chiselapp.com.
 
 I cannot upload it because it is larger than 8M. Chiselapp website suggests 
 to create a new project then push to it:
 
 Limit 8M in size. If your repository is larger than this, create a new empty 
 project and push to it instead.
 
 When I try to push from my current local repository to new on chiselapp, I 
 get this error:
 
 Error: wrong project
 
 Is there a way to push/pull/sync between unrelated repositories?
 
 
 Thanks.
 
 
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
 

-- 
James Turner
ja...@calminferno.net
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] unexpected results when branching

2011-12-20 Thread urban

Hello list,

I wanted to checkout how branching works but I got unexpected results.
Here is the  session. In en empty directory I did:

sh-4.1# fossil new test
project-id: 788376d693c5a597f327fb01901ab263e333870d
server-id:  52a134e7d9d44f546d033b914322a2962da1d756
admin-user: root (initial password is 957271)
sh-4.1# fossil open test
sh-4.1# touch file1
sh-4.1# fossil add file1
ADDED  file1
sh-4.1# fossil commit -m one
New_Version: e5eb048857578372dace96a98579b7fd99849b72
sh-4.1# fossil branch new esp trunk
gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
gpg: out-E128D037D5A8CDA68BE8: clearsign failed: secret key not available
unable to sign manifest.  continue (y/N)? y
New branch: fa005bdc7d8f72a8d3aa6be4573ddfdad4d857f5
sh-4.1# fossil branch
  esp
* trunk
sh-4.1# fossil checkout esp
file1
sh-4.1# fossil rm *
DELETED file1
sh-4.1# fossil add file1 # nothing added ?!
sh-4.1# fossil ls
file1
sh-4.1# fossil branch
* esp
  trunk
sh-4.1# fossil commit -m two
New_Version: 537f08cc487c572a781888c73b4e6d6811fef9a9
sh-4.1# fossil checkout trunk # file1 is there.
sh-4.1# fossil checkout esp
sh-4.1# fossil ls
sh-4.1#   # file1 is gone.

If I do rm * , then commit, then add file1 again in the new branch, the
result is different. I read the archives and the branching tutorial, did
I miss something ? (fossil version 1.20)

Regards,
urban

ps. my project is here: http://chiselapp.com/user/jcage/repository/rdk/
Thanks Richard for fossil and James for the web space!




___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] unexpected results when branching

2011-12-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:02:36PM +, urban wrote:
 
 Hello list,
 
 I wanted to checkout how branching works but I got unexpected results.
 Here is the  session. In en empty directory I did:
 
 sh-4.1# fossil new test
 project-id: 788376d693c5a597f327fb01901ab263e333870d
 server-id:  52a134e7d9d44f546d033b914322a2962da1d756
 admin-user: root (initial password is 957271)
 sh-4.1# fossil open test
 sh-4.1# touch file1
 sh-4.1# fossil add file1
 ADDED  file1
 sh-4.1# fossil commit -m one
 New_Version: e5eb048857578372dace96a98579b7fd99849b72
 sh-4.1# fossil branch new esp trunk
 gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
 gpg: out-E128D037D5A8CDA68BE8: clearsign failed: secret key not available
 unable to sign manifest.  continue (y/N)? y
 New branch: fa005bdc7d8f72a8d3aa6be4573ddfdad4d857f5
 sh-4.1# fossil branch
   esp
 * trunk
 sh-4.1# fossil checkout esp
 file1
 sh-4.1# fossil rm *
 DELETED file1
 sh-4.1# fossil add file1 # nothing added ?!
 sh-4.1# fossil ls
 file1
 sh-4.1# fossil branch
 * esp
   trunk
 sh-4.1# fossil commit -m two
 New_Version: 537f08cc487c572a781888c73b4e6d6811fef9a9
 sh-4.1# fossil checkout trunk # file1 is there.
 sh-4.1# fossil checkout esp
 sh-4.1# fossil ls
 sh-4.1#   # file1 is gone.
 
 If I do rm * , then commit, then add file1 again in the new branch, the
 result is different. I read the archives and the branching tutorial, did
 I miss something ? (fossil version 1.20)

You say nothing added?. Right. Nothing added.
fossil revert file1 would have brought your file back at that time.
Therefore, you commited removal of file1 at commit 'two'.

Does this make more sene?

Regards,
Lluís.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] bug in user handling

2011-12-20 Thread Ron Wilson
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Based on what I've tried so far fossil ui will *always* choose the first
 user listed in the user table. None of $USER, --user, -U, default-user in
 global-config or in config will override fossil ui using the first user
 listed.

 I guess this was implemented this way for ticket c9e84b5671 (which I don't
 think makes necessarily makes sense) so the solution is in fixing clone to
 add the target user as #1 when cloning from a file.

Wouldn't it make more sense for fossil ui to use the logged in user?
Also, in fossil server, I agree it would make more sense to default
treating local user as super user to off.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users