Thus said Stephan Beal on Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:54:02 +0100:
> i understand that i'm in the minority here, but i literally would not
> notice if addremove/clean were removed as features, and if the whole
> ignore glob stuff went away.
Not that this matters, but I'm in the same camp---I
Hi, all,
Thanks to the efforts and patience of Jans Nijtmans, libfossil now builds
warning-free and all of its unit tests now run (and pass!) on Cygwin64:
http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/libfossil/index.cgi/timeline?c=2014-02-28+14:00:46
My many thanks to Jan!
--
- stephan beal
http
> i can't say i've ever needed it. i always tell the SCM _exactly_ which
> files it should add/commit. i rarely even rely on "fossil commit" with
> no file arguments, simply out of principal (i don't like software trying
> to be too clever on my behalf, and i also don't want to accidentally
> commi
2014-02-28 11:54 GMT+01:00 Stephan Beal :
> To touch on Jan's answer: "clean" is another feature i don't use because i
> only trust cleanup rules i wrote myself ;).
Me too: I only use "fossil clean" in projects where I wrote the
".fossil_settings/ignore-glob" file. Currently that's libfossil,
Tcl/
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Samuel Debionne <
samuel.debio...@ujf-grenoble.fr> wrote:
> it's OK. Take fossil as an example : it generates a wbuild folder with
> the CGI translated sources that you want to ignore as far as versioning
> is concerned. In a larger project, this kind of situation
2014-02-28 11:25 GMT+01:00 Stephan Beal :
> Just out of curiosity: why are so many people so fascinated with the ignore
> handling? i have _never_ once (in 19 years of using SCM) relied on an
> exclusion list to determine what does into my repo, so i find it hard to see
> why other people rely on i
> Just out of curiosity: why are so many people so fascinated with the
> ignore handling? i have _never_ once (in 19 years of using SCM) relied
> on an exclusion list to determine what does into my repo, so i find it
> hard to see why other people rely on it. (Not trying to start a flame
> way, jus
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Samuel Debionne <
samuel.debio...@ujf-grenoble.fr> wrote:
> Yep I knew about it and use quite often (a nice addition of 1.27 if I
> remember right). But as you say, it's not quite the same !
>
> >> fossil extra --ignore "ignore-glob,foo/*,*.bar"
>
Just out of cur
> "fossil extra" allows additional arguments, providing subdirectories. So,
> in stead of specifying what you are NOT interested in, you can
> specify what you are interested in. e.g.:
> fossil extra dir1 dir2
> OK, not quite the same, but good to know. ;-)
Yep I knew about it and use quite
2014-02-28 10:43 GMT+01:00 Samuel Debionne :
> Is there a way to have the --ignore pattern be a complement (rather than
> a replacement) of the ignore-glob pattern ?
>
> Something like :
>
> fossil extra --ignore "ignore-glob,foo/*,*.bar"
"fossil extra" allows additional arguments, providing subdi
2014-02-28 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ramon Ribó :
> In the last fossil versions, it has changed. Now, there are two commands
> that do nearly the same "annotate" and "blame" that make the interface more
> complex and that many people cannot distinguish. Once inside, the default
> option is to just use some an
Hello all,
The extra command help states that :
"The GLOBPATTERN is a comma-separated list of GLOB expressions for
files that are ignored. The GLOBPATTERN specified by the "ignore-glob"
is used if the --ignore option *is omitted*."
Is there a way to have the --ignore pattern be a complement (ra
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Ramon Ribó wrote:
> One of the key points that make a software like fossil so good is the care
> taken to define the interfaces. In general, they are minimalist and very
> useful. It was the case for the "annotate" option in the web interface.
> Clear, simple and
Hello,
One of the key points that make a software like fossil so good is the care
taken to define the interfaces. In general, they are minimalist and very
useful. It was the case for the "annotate" option in the web interface.
Clear, simple and useful.
In the last fossil versions, it has changed
14 matches
Mail list logo
