Thus said Donny Ward on Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:29:07 -0700:
> I have two versions of my repository that I've saved from a while ago,
> the last time I ran into this syncing issue. I've linked them both
> here, hoping that someone can analyze them and figure out what the
> issue is.
Indeed it
Hello,
I was just trying to build Fossil on the x86-64 version of Haiku, and
it didn't get far since the platform failed to be identified. I
replaced the versions of config.guess and config.sub shipped with
Fossil and then configure worked, as well as the rest of the build.
Is there any chance t
Hello,
while taking a look at RSS feed feature, I notice 'fossil help rss' is
missing a 'Usage:' clause. No idea if this is intentional. Obviously
not a major issue.
Michai
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fos
I have two versions of my repository that I've saved from a while ago, the
last time I ran into this syncing issue. I've linked them both here, hoping
that someone can analyze them and figure out what the issue is. In this
case, the artifact not being synced is a new branch commit (see commit
a9b13
Hello,
a pretty vague report/question: I recently had the situation where a
repo existed on host B, wich remote-url pointing to a repo on host A.
On host A, somehow the remote-url of the local repo was pointing
(using 'file:///...') to itself, causing sync to fail. This is no
surprise really.
I
On 21 June 2014 18:48, Michai Ramakers wrote:
>
> does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each
> others remote-url?
rephrase: ... having each other as remote-url (i.e. repo on box A has
the repo on box B as remote-url, and vice versa)
__
Hello,
does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each
others remote-url? I can imagine things get a bit weird, sync-tree
wise, when more machines are involved, but I couldn't think of a
counter-argument for 2 machines. It's just that I've never seen such a
setup being mention
7 matches
Mail list logo
