Hello,
from `fossil help revert`
...
"Revert all files if no file name is provided."
and here is my test:
/home/juef/tmp/fossil/test: f time
=== 2015-07-18 ===
18:55:39 [b0d58a9f51] *CURRENT* c3 (user: juef tags: trunk)
18:55:16 [b2f66fde1a] c2 (user: juef tags: trunk)
18:54:52 [4deb08b494] c1
On 18/07/15 17:09, Scott Robison wrote:
> Still on phone. Instead of -euser how about -author? Instinctively seems
> less clumsy but it's just a knee-jerk reaction to -euser which seems both
> long and short simultaneously. :)
I agree x 2.
--
Kind Regards,
Jan
Still on phone. Instead of -euser how about -author? Instinctively seems
less clumsy but it's just a knee-jerk reaction to -euser which seems both
long and short simultaneously. :)
On Jul 18, 2015 8:35 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Andy Bradford
> wrote:
>
>> I
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> What is your opinion on making the default action of the command without
> any options imply -e? I think I could be convinced that this should be
> the default option if none specified as Sergei and Scott have argued.
> That would actua
Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:10:42 +0300:
> However, with a forest the options Fossil CLI increasingly resembles
> Git CLI :-)
Perhaps then, ``amend'' should only have short options where ``commit''
has short options?
I think this should be the case just so people who us
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:35:46 +0200:
> -e|--edit-comment Launch editor to revise comment
>
> i know my own most-used will be -e, but i like -m (as mentioned
> earlier) for this: -m|-comment for symmetry with commit. #2 would be
> tagging, #3 would be the t
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> It doesn't have to be euser, but the rational there was for edited user.
> Have another suggestion?
>
No better suggestion - euser matches the event table, too.
> > -s|--close
> >
> > just so that the short-form flag is a letter in the wo
Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:18:09 +0300:
> Back to amend's options. Short counter-part for `--comment' option
> would be `-m' option. The fossil commit command uses `-m'.
Yes, much better suggestion, thank you. I'll take a look at the commit
command and see how many
Thus said Scott Robison on Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:20:35 -0600:
> On phone, apologies for top posting. To me "amend " should
> behave as much as possible like "commit", though I can appreciate that
> some might disagree.
Is the primary purpose, or most frequent use, of the amend subcommand to
e
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:46:40 +0200:
> Why is 'e'user needed? Is there a global flag for --user which
> collides with it?
Yes, unfortunately there is the global --user option with which it
collides. Setting it causes Fossil to fail with an error about not being
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> --edit-comment option. However, with a forest the options Fossil
> CLI increasingly resembles Git CLI :-)
>
> See:
>
> http://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/
Of course, I have be
On 18 July 2015 at 11:54, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sergei Gavrikov
> wrote:
>>
>> --edit-comment option. However, with a forest the options Fossil CLI
>> increasingly resembles Git CLI :-)
>
> See:
>
> http://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/
funny, nice one :-)
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> --edit-comment option. However, with a forest the options Fossil CLI
> increasingly resembles Git CLI :-)
>
See:
http://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Scott Robison wrote:
> On phone, apologies for top posting. To me "amend " should behave as
> much as possible like "commit", though I can appreciate that some might
> disagree.
Then even more. The sub-command syntax shall be
fossil amend ?OPTIONS?
Thus, quick editing the
On Sat, 17 Jul 2015, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:21:55 +0300:
>
> > I also expected that 'fossil amend ' will spawn $EDITOR with an
> > original check-in message likes 'fossil commit' does. But, I met cold
> > silence. Probably, to support $EDITOR for
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> Also, should some of these options have a short option analog, for
> example:
>
>-u|--euser USER Make USER the check-in user
>
Why is 'e'user needed? Is there a global flag for --user which collides
with it?
-e|--edit-
> Is your intent to co-mingle same-named branches? I.e. if there is a
> trunk in both source repos do you wish to merge both dev streams to a
> single trunk?
Yes. Basically, it's two source repos of two embedded gizmos. They are
interrelated and share a couple of headers (protocol message formats
17 matches
Mail list logo
