Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Michai Ramakers wrote: > On 24 August 2015 at 13:29, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Stephan Beal wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > >> Two lists (C/P) look too long for human. Perhaps, Fossil > >> documentation reached the state when tag cloud > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud would be the next > >> solution and we could have some "horizontal" layout for the > >> "permuted index". But, all articles must have the precision set > >> of key words. > >> > >> Fossil's tagging model inherently supports tagging arbitrary content > >> (including doc files, for use in a tag cloud, or even tagging other tags), > >> but we've currently got no code for handling tags anywhere except commits. > >> Looking at the schema's comments, it seems that tag propagation (which > >> would > >> be needed for tagging doc files) only applies to checkins, and i'm not sure > >> what change(s) would be needed to support that. > > > > Really. > > > >> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/cae75601dd0b3940bc192ff5a8b142d09 > >> 9bbc4e3?txt=1&ln=376-390 > > > > Then `mkindex.tcl' script would "grep" `fossil tags` output to build > > tag-cloud in HTML if all doc pages were tagged using known semantic, > > however, it is possible also to set any tag(s) directly in Tcl script > > (in addition to a title) for that. > > that's a bit outside my skill and interest w.r.t. HTML/CSS I fear, but > the idea looks interesting. Do you have any example (URL?) or idea of > how a tag-cloud could look for Fossil, taking into account the > appearance of the rest of the site? I did not resist on tag cloud. That was just an idea about compact layout for long list of Fossil documents. How would it look. For example, surf to http://www.tagcrowd.com/, choose 'Web Page URL' tab. I entered the URL http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/permutedindex.html and got one nice example (auto-generated tag cloud can be downloaded as embedded HTML, an image or PDF file). I saw two big (bold) words between 50 other, *fossil* and ... *git* :-) I do not sure that generated PDF (http://www.tagcrowd.com/pdf/1440448147_cloud.pdf) will be exist a while, but, you can create own version. Sergei ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On 24 August 2015 at 12:55, Michai Ramakers wrote: > On 24 August 2015 at 20:30, jungle Boogie wrote: >> >> Do you think the permuted index should be listed on the sitemap? It's >> already in the header as 'Docs' but so are wiki, timeline, tickets, >> etc. > > I don't know... To me "permuted index" didn't ring a bell before I saw > Fossil, but some people are familiar with it. > To me, "Docs" and "Download" (and "About") or similar are perhaps the > first things I look for on a site, and they are pretty easy to find on > fossil-scm.org :) > Whatever it's called, it's _not_ on the sitemap. Do you think it should be listed as something on the sitemap? > Michai -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On 24 August 2015 at 13:29, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: >> Two lists (C/P) look too long for human. Perhaps, Fossil >> documentation reached the state when tag cloud >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud would be the next >> solution and we could have some "horizontal" layout for the >> "permuted index". But, all articles must have the precision set >> of key words. >> >> Fossil's tagging model inherently supports tagging arbitrary content >> (including doc files, for use in a tag cloud, or even tagging other tags), >> but we've currently got no code for handling tags anywhere except commits. >> Looking at the schema's comments, it seems that tag propagation (which would >> be needed for tagging doc files) only applies to checkins, and i'm not sure >> what change(s) would be needed to support that. > > Really. > >> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/cae75601dd0b3940bc192ff5a8b142d09 >> 9bbc4e3?txt=1&ln=376-390 > > Then `mkindex.tcl' script would "grep" `fossil tags` output to build > tag-cloud in HTML if all doc pages were tagged using known semantic, > however, it is possible also to set any tag(s) directly in Tcl script > (in addition to a title) for that. that's a bit outside my skill and interest w.r.t. HTML/CSS I fear, but the idea looks interesting. Do you have any example (URL?) or idea of how a tag-cloud could look for Fossil, taking into account the appearance of the rest of the site? Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On 24 August 2015 at 20:30, jungle Boogie wrote: > > Do you think the permuted index should be listed on the sitemap? It's > already in the header as 'Docs' but so are wiki, timeline, tickets, > etc. I don't know... To me "permuted index" didn't ring a bell before I saw Fossil, but some people are familiar with it. To me, "Docs" and "Download" (and "About") or similar are perhaps the first things I look for on a site, and they are pretty easy to find on fossil-scm.org :) Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Files shared (and updated) between repos?
On 21 August 2015 at 03:02, Johan Kuuse wrote: > Hi, > > Everytime I create a new repos, I use a few files which I would like > to have access to in all my repos: > > - README.fossil.new.repo : My own notes about how to setup a new repo. > - setup-fossil.sh : A script how to setup a new repo automatically. > - fossil-config.txt: A common configure file I would like to apply to > all my repos. > > I would like to share these files among all my repos, both to access > them and to update/improve them when needed. > Anyway, to avoid duplicates of these files, I would preferred to > update them in one single place, so these files probably should be > stored in their own repos, what I would called a "shared" repos. > Is there a way to achieve this? Or otherwise, any other solutions or > workaround? > > Any suggestions appreciated. > There is a Fossil template option and it would be cool to see it expanded to setup a skeleton directory, like unix-like OS' can do for new user accounts. > Best Regards, > Johan -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
Hi Michai, On 24 August 2015 at 02:02, Michai Ramakers wrote: > On 17 August 2015 at 21:12, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> >> Another suggestion was to move the list of canonical titles in front >> of the original permuted index - which sounds perfect to me. > > Done in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/49a77b5184ef2f5a , and > for preview visit > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/doc-bold-canonical/www/permutedindex.html > . > Looks nice to me, nice work. Do you think the permuted index should be listed on the sitemap? It's already in the header as 'Docs' but so are wiki, timeline, tickets, etc. > Michai -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > Two lists (C/P) look too long for human. Perhaps, Fossil > documentation reached the state when tag cloud > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud would be the next > solution and we could have some "horizontal" layout for the > "permuted index". But, all articles must have the precision set > of key words. > > Fossil's tagging model inherently supports tagging arbitrary content > (including doc files, for use in a tag cloud, or even tagging other tags), > but we've currently got no code for handling tags anywhere except commits. > Looking at the schema's comments, it seems that tag propagation (which would > be needed for tagging doc files) only applies to checkins, and i'm not sure > what change(s) would be needed to support that. Really. > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/cae75601dd0b3940bc192ff5a8b142d09 > 9bbc4e3?txt=1&ln=376-390 Then `mkindex.tcl' script would "grep" `fossil tags` output to build tag-cloud in HTML if all doc pages were tagged using known semantic, however, it is possible also to set any tag(s) directly in Tcl script (in addition to a title) for that. Sergei___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > Two lists (C/P) look too long for human. Perhaps, Fossil documentation > reached the state when tag cloud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud > would be the next solution and we could have some "horizontal" layout > for the "permuted index". But, all articles must have the precision set > of key words. > Fossil's tagging model inherently supports tagging arbitrary content (including doc files, for use in a tag cloud, or even tagging other tags), but we've currently got no code for handling tags anywhere except commits. Looking at the schema's comments, it seems that tag propagation (which would be needed for tagging doc files) only applies to checkins, and i'm not sure what change(s) would be needed to support that. http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/cae75601dd0b3940bc192ff5a8b142d099bbc4e3?txt=1&ln=376-390 -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > Done in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/49a77b5184ef2f5a , > and for preview visit > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/doc-bold-canonical/www/permutedindex.html > > > IMO that is far less likely to confuse people than the current > (permuted-only) page. For my current screen resolution new design takes 7 PgDn, old - 5 PgDn (something similar for "mice" scrolling). IMO, "Canonical Index" once more duplicates "Permuted Index" and it would be enough for now just to add a footnote for the title, "What Permuted Index is" or add the very first item for the list Permuted Index: * 0 What Permuted Index is * 5 Minutes as a Single User — Update and Running in * ... Two lists (C/P) look too long for human. Perhaps, Fossil documentation reached the state when tag cloud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud would be the next solution and we could have some "horizontal" layout for the "permuted index". But, all articles must have the precision set of key words. Sergei___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > Done in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/49a77b5184ef2f5a , and > for preview visit > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/doc-bold-canonical/www/permutedindex.html IMO that is far less likely to confuse people than the current (permuted-only) page. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] "permuted index" doc-page: request for feedback (was: "Remove redundant shun links from doc page.")
On 17 August 2015 at 21:12, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > Another suggestion was to move the list of canonical titles in front > of the original permuted index - which sounds perfect to me. Done in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/49a77b5184ef2f5a , and for preview visit http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/doc-bold-canonical/www/permutedindex.html . Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] problem with (svn) import
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:24:21 +0200 Stephan Beal wrote: > Please try again with the trunk. That seems to have been fixed > recently: > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/915d61933c0a3a4c Thank you. It fixes the problem. Sincerely, Gour p.s. Btw, I recenlty felt (again, for the 2nd time) pain in my right wrist and decided to permanently settle on vim not wanting to arrive at your state and create more damage than required. -- As a strong wind sweeps away a boat on the water, even one of the roaming senses on which the mind focuses can carry away a man's intelligence. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] problem with (svn) import
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Gour wrote: > fossil: ./src/blob.c:276: blob_append: Assertion `aData!=0' failed. > Please try again with the trunk. That seems to have been fixed recently: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/915d61933c0a3a4c -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] problem with (svn) import
Hello, Recently bought a book to learn Object Pascal and the code examples are onine in Subversion repo... Tried to convert to Fossil with the following sequence: svnrdump dump http://code.marcocantu.com/svn_public/marcocantu_objectpascalhandbook > oph.dump fossil import --svn --flat oph.fossil ~/repos/external/oph.dump and 'fossil open looked fine'. However, when I do 'fossil ui' and try 'Timeline' I get: fossil: ./src/blob.c:276: blob_append: Assertion `aData!=0' failed. Any idea? Btw, repo is freely available online if someone wants to reproduce it... Sincerely, Gour -- One is understood to be in full knowledge whose every endeavor is devoid of desire for sense gratification. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
