Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion

2015-11-17 Thread Richard Hipp
On 11/17/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and > vice versa. > "scroll" should match "scrolling" if you activate the "Porter Stemmer" option -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion

2015-11-17 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
I tried it, and no, it doesn't -- I'm talking about SEARCH from the command-line in case there is some misunderstanding. (Let alone that the "Porter Stemmer" option changed my repo from 40MB to 102MB!!!) -Original Message- From: Richard Hipp Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:03 PM

[fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion

2015-11-17 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
When using SEARCH you need to type the word exactly as it appears in the timeline. I’m guessing it uses SQL’s LIKE to find the related matches. So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and vice versa. One suggestion is to append ‘%’ to the search term to match

Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion

2015-11-17 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
This worked (and I without the Porter Stemmer 'bloat'). Thanks. -Original Message- From: Michael Keuter Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:10 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion Am 17.11.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Richard

Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion

2015-11-17 Thread Michael Keuter
Am 17.11.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Tony Papadimitriou : > I tried it, and no, it doesn't -- I'm talking about SEARCH from the > command-line in case there is some misunderstanding. > (Let alone that the "Porter Stemmer" option changed my repo from 40MB to > 102MB!!) fossil search

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

2015-11-17 Thread Matt Welland
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Dömötör Gulyás wrote: > I've got an environment where it'd be good to put a fossil repo onto a > windows network share, as running an actual server is hindered by corporate > IT policy. Has anybody done this, or is this at least theoretically

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

2015-11-17 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Dömötör Gulyás wrote: > I've got an environment where it'd be good to put a fossil repo onto a > windows network share, as running an actual server is hindered by corporate > IT policy. Has anybody done this, or is this at least theoretically

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

2015-11-17 Thread Richard Hipp
On 11/16/15, Dömötör Gulyás wrote: > running an actual server is hindered by corporate > IT policy. Can you not just run: fossil server from your personal desktop/laptop machine, and have your colleagues connect to that, and not tell corporate about it? -- D. Richard

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

2015-11-17 Thread Dömötör Gulyás
Unfortunately the corporate network in this case is rather conservative, and I can't have a server running, plus I can't even connect my main dev laptop to the corp network... rather silly, the whole thing is. The company has a private github, BUT that is again not accessible from the dev laptop

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

2015-11-17 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Dömötör Gulyás wrote: > Unfortunately the corporate network in this case is rather conservative, > and I can't have a server running, plus I can't even connect my main dev > laptop to the corp network... rather silly, the whole thing is. >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil repo on a network share?

2015-11-17 Thread Richard Hipp
On 11/17/15, Ron W wrote: > > If every dev has a separate dev laptop, you could sync to each other using > a cross-over ethernet cable Yeah. Or maybe connect a RaspberryPi or Beaglebone to a cheap Wifi hub and create your own private network? (Are all the developers within