Re: [fossil-users] Web comment editor transforms LF into CRLF

On 6/17/2016 5:33 PM, Scott Robison wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Warren Young > wrote: For any blob data that Fossil considers “text,” why not strip all CRs on ingest, then based on either a setting or platform check inject

Re: [fossil-users] Web comment editor transforms LF into CRLF

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 17, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Scott Robison > wrote: > > > > Would it be a bad thing to just settle on LF only going forward, always > stripping CR? > > The argument over canonicalizing all text

Re: [fossil-users] Web comment editor transforms LF into CRLF

On Jun 17, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > Would it be a bad thing to just settle on LF only going forward, always > stripping CR? The argument over canonicalizing all text input to LF has been had here before — with me as at least one of its proponents —

Re: [fossil-users] Web comment editor transforms LF into CRLF

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Warren Young wrote: > While trying to replicate the problem reported in another thread,[1] I > noticed an odd behavior. If I edit a comment via fossil ui, then pull the > change and try to edit it locally with fossil amend, Vim shows ^M >

[fossil-users] Web comment editor transforms LF into CRLF

While trying to replicate the problem reported in another thread,[1] I noticed an odd behavior. If I edit a comment via fossil ui, then pull the change and try to edit it locally with fossil amend, Vim shows ^M characters at the end of every line, implying that Fossil UI has transformed the LF

Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL does not push edit comment changes, is this normal?

On Jun 17, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > After editing a couple of check-in comments How, exactly? Via fossil ui or fossil amend? > I did ‘push’ and saw zero artifacts sent. I just did two edits, one via ui on the remote server and one via amend in the local

Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL does not push edit comment changes, is this normal?

I tried to reproduce the general sequence of actions on a fresh repo but I can't seem to repeat the problem. However, it does it consistently on my end for this one repo. I'm keeping a 'frozen' backup of these two files (local and remote) for future investigation, if possible at a later

Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL does not push edit comment changes, is this normal?

On 6/17/16, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > This is fossil version 1.35 [3aa86af6aa] 2016-06-14 11:10:39 UTC > > After editing a couple of check-in comments, I did ‘push’ and saw zero > artifacts sent. Here’s the output: > > I don’t think this is expected behavior, is it? If not,

[fossil-users] FOSSIL does not push edit comment changes, is this normal?

This is fossil version 1.35 [3aa86af6aa] 2016-06-14 11:10:39 UTC After editing a couple of check-in comments, I did ‘push’ and saw zero artifacts sent. Here’s the output: Push to file://E:/db/xxx.fossil Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Push done, sent: 281962 received: 12407