Re: [fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Dewey Hylton on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:23:23 -0500: > All users have read/write permissions on those files, so this doesn't > make sense (to me) from a Unix permissions standpoint. As Warren asked, what are the permissions on the directory that contains the Fossils? Not only does

Re: [fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Warren Young on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:02:01 -0700: > Linux containers aren't foolproof when it comes to permission > isolation. Better to not let Fossil have root privs even inside a > container. Fossil does chroot first and then drop root privileges which then

Re: [fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 20, 2017, at 6:23 PM, Dewey Hylton wrote: > > All users have read/write permissions on those files, so this doesn’t make > sense (to me) from a Unix permissions standpoint. Fine, but what about the directory that holds these files? That’s why I applied the

[fossil-users] linenoise bug: multi-line paste fails in "fossil sql"

2017-12-20 Thread Peter MacDonald
A minor bug: https://github.com/antirez/linenoise/issues/75 This also affected my current project (jsish.org) so I thought I'd mention it here. Note: some reported possible issues on some platforms, but the patch worked fine in my limited testing. BTW: I've subsequently upgraded to a newer

Re: [fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread Richard Hipp
On 12/20/17, dewey.hyl...@gmail.com wrote: > Would someone help me understand what I'm seeing here? I expect a list of > repositories > in the web page output, but am told there are none. I don't understand it either. To debug, recompile Fossil with -g and -O0. Create a

Re: [fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread Dewey Hylton
Oh, and THANK YOU for responding. > On Dec 20, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Warren Young wrote: > >> On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:40 PM, dewey.hyl...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> # ls -lh /fossils|grep fossil >> -rw-rw-rw-1 1000 root 272.0K Dec 19 14:37 archsetup.fossil >> -rw-rw-rw-

Re: [fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread Dewey Hylton
All users have read/write permissions on those files, so this doesn’t make sense (to me) from a Unix permissions standpoint. I am indeed a BSD guy, but ... in reality fossil is running in a docker container on a Linux server and accessing the files via sshfs mount. I can futz about and make

Re: [fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:40 PM, dewey.hyl...@gmail.com wrote: > > # ls -lh /fossils|grep fossil > -rw-rw-rw-1 1000 root 272.0K Dec 19 14:37 archsetup.fossil > -rw-rw-rw-1 1000 root 224.0K Dec 19 14:36 > guac-install-script.fossil > -rw-rw-rw-1 1000 root 224.0K

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

2017-12-20 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > If it’s a sign of a bug, then it means something very bad has happened, like > the network stack has lost track of its client somehow. To see that, you’d > need to do a network capture on that fossil instance’s network

[fossil-users] fossil --repolist showing no repositories

2017-12-20 Thread dewey.hyl...@gmail.com
Would someone help me understand what I'm seeing here? I expect a list of repositories in the web page output, but am told there are none. I've banged on this long enough to go cross-eyed, so I hope I'm just missing something very simple. I haven't found anything in the code that would cause

[fossil-users] Cross-link tech notes to commits

2017-12-20 Thread jungle Boogie
Hi All, I know a tech note entry in the timeline can be linked to a specific commit. For example: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?ss=m=200=e=0 See the top commit by AG. Can a commit message contain the [ID] of a tech note and have it linked to it? Otherwise, how do you list all tech

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic update when changing type on timeline?

2017-12-20 Thread jungle Boogie
On 19 December 2017 at 13:59, Florian Balmer wrote: > No, my patches were about intercepting the enter key from text input > elements to submit the form and update the view. > > In my tests, I found that the "onchange" handler worked fine for > drop-down lists, so you

Re: [fossil-users] Timeline comments ignore all newlines AGAIN...

2017-12-20 Thread sky5walk
Is this leading and trailing newline in 'timeline[Modern|Compact]Comment' intentional or bug? Is it necessary to create padding for the borders? If so, why can't borders be applied with CSS? I'm trying to shrink my Timeline text but no idea what CSS strips contents of object? What I see... "

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic update when changing type on timeline?

2017-12-20 Thread Florian Balmer
A submit button would make it more evident that the page can be updated by hitting enter or pressing the submit button. Relying on the JavaScript "onxxx" handlers to update the page works inconsistently across web browsers. Moreover, the page is updated each time an individual setting is