On 6/4/2015 12:44 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
On 6/3/2015 8:27 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
After renaming files on a branch, it seems Fossil will allow you only
one successful merge until it loses track of which files are which.
Here's a sequence showing the problem (version 3ffb6a3e62):
[see
http
On 6/3/2015 8:27 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
After renaming files on a branch, it seems Fossil will allow you only
one successful merge until it loses track of which files are which.
Here's a sequence showing the problem (version 3ffb6a3e62):
[see
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users
Fossil has Tcl heritage through SQLite, also TH1, so it makes sense that
this convention carry through by habit.
I believe very very old Tcl used square brackets in its documentation to
indicate optional arguments, but it quickly switched to question marks to
avoid ambiguity with script
effort, yet I need to
continue merging stuff from trunk which doesn't have the renames.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http
there's no problem deleting a file called hello whilst creating a file
called hello/world.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On 6/4/2015 7:33 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
On 6/4/2015 12:44 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
On 6/3/2015 8:27 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
After renaming files on a branch, Fossil will allow you only one
successful merge until it loses track of which files are which.
Here's a sequence showing the problem (version
Is there any interest in making fossil clean be an undoable operation?
If fossil revert is undoable, why not fossil clean?
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing
rename unset
Any questions or comments? Please review. I'll merge to trunk if no
one objects in the next few days.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
On 6/26/2015 9:39 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
2015-06-26 6:31 GMT+02:00 Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com:
Is there any interest in making fossil clean be an undoable operation?
If fossil revert is undoable, why not fossil clean?
I already implemented that, feel free to experiment
the unnecessary .fossil file. User fossil
doesn't do any development, anyway.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http
to this list saying there's an
environment variable that can be set to make Fossil not get an exclusive
lock on the repository, but I can't find the post now.
What's the truth of the matter?
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the web
administration interface to configure the timeline to show in local time.
This should be documented on the Fossil website someplace
Yes, please.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source feature does not. I have reported
the bug here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179073 if
anyone cares. So my little joke bore some fruit.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 7/1/2015 2:09 AM, Martijn Coppoolse wrote:
On 1-7-2015 3:40, Andy Goth wrote:
However, Firefox's View Page Source feature does not. I have reported
the bug here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179073 if
anyone cares. So my little joke bore some fruit.
Expect the bug
base64-encoded emails) right in the web UI, but
relying an external MUA like Thunderbird suits my needs for now.
Thoughts?
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
, and the attachments.
I wish to preserve the original emails so signatures validate. I also
prefer one file per email.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil
and hidden.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
realize the branch command could be used to create new branches
since I've only ever used commit -branch to do this. Creating a new
branch without putting any changes in it is not something I've wanted to
do before, and if I did, I would have used commit -allow-empty.
--
Andy Goth
On 5/17/2015 7:45 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users%40lists.fossil-scm.org/msg20586.html
I found another consequence. This affects the finfo command.
Test case from before:
f init x.fossil
mkdir x
cd x
f open ../x.fossil
touch file1 file2
f add *
f commit -m 1
echo
On 8/3/2015 3:24 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:31 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Usually I don't bother, especially if there have been check-ins since
the error was committed.
Wouldn’t a better solution to that problem be a continuous integration
system, so you
have the option to export the
configuration to a file which can then be managed however you like.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users
On 8/3/2015 3:37 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/3/2015 2:01 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote:
On 3 August 2015 at 01:22, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote:
I've no idea if fossil mv now behaves exactly like mv.
indeed
trunk's initial empty check-in.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
when tracing the ancestry of a file.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman
I've used when not using Fossil is to rename my changed
files to have .new or such at the end of the name, revert to the last
checked-in version, then pull changes from the .new one at a time,
testing and committing after each.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
off-topic... does Fossil squawk about files using CR alone
or LFCR?
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil
the manifest containing the name.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman
and merging. No one has replied
to this thread, other than myself to report on further research.
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users%40lists.fossil-scm.org/msg20758.html
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 8/4/2015 2:02 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 4:35 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/3/2015 3:37 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Any plans to bring them in sync?
We had a long thread about it months
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+0
1
2
3
+4
$ echo -e '0\n1\n2\n3' file
$ f stash pop
MERGE file
$ cat file
0
1
2
3
4
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users
On 8/5/2015 12:34 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com
mailto:andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users%40lists.fossil-scm.org/msg20758.html
I have had people I support run into that several times. It would
On 8/6/2015 5:24 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 5, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/4/2015 3:53 PM, Warren Young wrote:
the chunks might have been modified before being checked in.
Stash saves the contents of the new file, along with the baseline
version
.
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
code knows where the problem is already.
I found the same bug and reported to the list. There were no replies.
https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg20593.html
--
Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
. That's a lot of noise, and it makes the tags page take a long
time to load.
Perhaps filtering would be of use. In the site configuration, I could
make a couple preset filters and put them in the navigation bar instead
of the default Tags link.
Thoughts?
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description
s and tags
could require a new type of control artifact. Or it could require that
the wiki page be specially formatted, e.g. the first paragraph is taken
to be the description, which is probably a better idea anyway so it can
all be edited in the same interface.
Any thoughts?
--
Andy Goth |
sig
.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
I have a hybrid Fossil/ClearCase checkout directory with ClearCase driving
and Fossil synchronizing, like I described earlier on this list.
"f changes" takes 0.061 seconds to complete.
The ClearCase equivalent is to get a list of checked-out (editable) files
and a list of hijacked (edited
Not sure it's fair to include my quote when I've never once actually used
git, but I appreciate your vote.
On May 18, 2016 09:29, "Richie Adler" <richiead...@gmail.com> wrote:
> El 18/05/2016 a las 10:56, Andy Goth escribió:
> > [...] the git model may have compr
What happens if you make the directory first?
On May 19, 2016 11:45, "Steve Schow" wrote:
> I am having a little problem with one thing in fossil, what am I doing
> wrong.
>
> I have file:
>
> /foo/bar/is/here
>
> I want to relocate in the repository src try to:
>
>
xed in the reparent command. Previously I found that this stays
broken until a new branch is created.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On 5/22/2016 4:43 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
> 2016-05-22 1:05 GMT+02:00 Andy Goth:
>> What is keep-glob good for? Does anyone use it in their projects? Or
>> the -keep option to clean?
>
> I use it for protecting the built fossil executable being cleaned. So I
> ca
On 5/22/2016 3:53 PM, Steve Schow wrote:
> I’m sorry I’m not seeing anywhere that ticket “reports” are contained as
> versioned artifacts…
Ticket reports are formatted the same as changes.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
istake" and marking it as hidden and closed.
The third option is shunning. Don't do that. It's dangerous and far
more trouble than it's worth.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
f
w how to clean them up. But I rarely get the
chance to do the build system or beat it into shape. So I'm happy to
have a version control system that can also handle the job.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-use
On 5/22/2016 3:42 PM, Steve Schow wrote:
> On May 22, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Everything in Fossil is stored in artifacts.
>
> Are ticket reports stored as versioned artifacts?
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki#t
It's a
non-issue for branches since only one -branch can be specified. So
yeah, don't rename -description to -branch-description; it's unambiguous
as it is.
On top of all this, I'd still like for the branch and tag list pages to
link to wiki pages with the same name as the branch or ta
realistic motivating cases where a file would need to
be spared from clean but also be subject to addition via addremove.
(By the way, I frequently use open -keep and checkout -keep, but despite
the name they're unrelated to clean -keep.)
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 5/21/2016 6:27 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote:
> In message <3d27b874-c4db-f4e9-956f-7bbfd651b...@gmail.com>,
> Andy Goth writes:
>> How about tags? Put the description in the check-in manifest of the
>> first usage of the tag, I suppose.
>
> That's my thought.
out of its way to delete forgotten files still lurking in the tree.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On 5/21/2016 9:03 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
> Andy Goth wrote:
>> The clean command has gotten very complicated, so I further advocate
>> removing the -emptydirs and -dotfiles options and making them always
>> be in effect. Empty directories requiring preservation should be
&
t avoiding naming collisions. In my case, I'm
looking at merging two repositories (one of them Subversion) that were
independently maintained and occasionally sync'ed by hand.
Comments welcome.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 5/12/2016 11:15 AM, Andy Goth wrote:
> "Add -rename-trunk, -rename-branch, -rename-tag, -rename-rev, -rev-tags,
> and -no-rev-tags options to import command"
I should add that I only tested it with Subversion since I have zero Git
experience.
--
Andy Goth |
signature
considered the possibility of a range of
versions being included in the cherrypick/backout merge, and I have no
idea how how to show the range. Again I guess it's better to not try.
It's very late, and I have a plane to catch tomorrow, so those are all
the though
.
Of course, none of that matters since he started by prioritizing marketing.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman
On 5/16/2016 11:41 AM, John P. Rouillard wrote:
> Richard Hipp writes:
>> On 5/15/16, Andy Goth <andrew.m.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> To fix, you're going to have to go back to the version prior to the shun
>>> and redo every check-in since that p
can rebuild the repo if you like it
> makes no difference.
Go look in /bloblist and you'll find that 2shun is still there, even
after a rebuild. You've not actually succeeded in removing the
dangerous data from your repository. It's still there despite not being
connected to anything.
--
Andy
On 5/16/2016 1:17 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
> He said he thinks he'll go with Git instead because that would give the
> engineers working under him more forward mobility when they eventually
> move on to other companies, whereas Fossil is unknown and would not
> improve their e
On 5/16/2016 11:24 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> It overwrote the whole drive with the word Hello.
Or at least the first block, which is arguably the most important one
since it tends to contain tables critical to being able to actually find
anything.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Descript
On 5/16/2016 8:00 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/16/16, Andy Goth <andrew.m.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've wanted reparenting capability to support importing old history into
>> a Fossil repository.
>
> I interpret your sentence above as "I volunteer to test o
edu>
Reply-To: rou...@ieee.org
To: Andy Goth <andrew.m.g...@gmail.com>
Hi Andy:
In message <5ae8586a-678d-2372-80f3-6804af670...@gmail.com>,
Andy Goth writes:
>I suggested he consider Fossil since I have already successfully
>imported his 10K+ Subversion revisions to a p
On 16 May 2016 15:34:02, John P. Rouillard <rou...@cs.umb.edu> wrote:
> Andy Goth writes:
>> He said he thinks he'll go with Git instead because that would give the
>> engineers working under him more forward mobility when they eventually
>> move on to other
change "unknown" to
"orphaned" or "unreferenced" or some such. And then we should add a
page listing such unreferenced artifacts, or update /bloblist to have
filter and/or sort options.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
On 5/17/2016 12:54 PM, Ron W wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Andy Goth <andrew.m.g...@gmail.com
> <mailto:andrew.m.g...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> So what would a Fossil analogue be? For simple cases, merge
>> -baseline root:branch does the trick.
>>
&g
?
No, nor would a rebuild, nor would a deconstruct followed by a
reconstruct.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
cm.org
> DNS Name: www.sqlite.org
Just hit this issue again. Is there any interest in fixing it? This
breaks any https://fossil-scm.org/ links.
Of course, https://www.fossil-scm.org/ works fine.
--
Andy Goth |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I suggested this feature on the wiki.
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=Fossil+2.0
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
301 - 367 of 367 matches
Mail list logo