Re: [fossil-users] Delay with `fossil ui' (related to backoffice processing?)

2018-07-22 Thread Florian Balmer
Thank very much for your feedback! Warren Young: > Which is it? With the random appearance of the delay, and the long duration of 60 seconds, I eventually gave up on "bisecting". But with a more systematic approach, I've now got: Last good: [06507038] First bad: [947081aa] > If the problem

Re: [fossil-users] Delay with `fossil ui' (related to backoffice processing?)

2018-07-22 Thread Florian Balmer
> ... writing to a FILE* pointing to NULL may have exactly the same > effect as writing to a FILE* pointing to "/dev/null"? Well, unless there's a directory named "dev" in the root of the current drive, which would result in creation (due to the passed "wb" mode) of a file named "null", on

Re: [fossil-users] Delay with `fossil ui' (related to backoffice processing?)

2018-07-22 Thread Florian Balmer
Richard Hipp: > Please test the latest trunk version and let me know if you are still > seeing issues. Thank you very much for the fix! I see no more delays with "fossil ui" on Windows. Just a thought: would it make sense to have --nodelay as a global option recognized by all commands, and

Re: [fossil-users] Backup traffic

2018-07-21 Thread Florian Balmer
Warren Young: > Quantify “a lot.” I have some rarely committed-to but frequently web-accessed repositories (with login), and I see daily backups of the modified repository database, even though I'm sure I haven't committed anything. It's like "hey, what's going on there with my babies?"

Re: [fossil-users] Minor Issues with Fossil 2.5

2018-03-02 Thread Florian Balmer
It's not at all that I think I'm the expert you've summoned in your last post on this thread. As you've been running your own high-traffic "althttpd" server for many years, maybe you should explain the Internet to us. I was doing some (limited) research about RFCs, recommendations from the Apache

<    1   2