Re: [fossil-users] Converting from mercurial

2011-07-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:18:29PM -0700, Jeremy Anderson wrote: Out of curiosity, why are you converting from mercurial? I ask because my friends and I adopted fossil and other friends of ours are asking us why we didn't go with mercurial instead. I didn't really have a good answer, apart

Re: [fossil-users] Converting from mercurial

2011-07-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:35:13AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: (3) Fossil gives you a timeline to help track your project. If Mercurial does this, I've never seen it. Well, there is 'hgk'. http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/HgkExtension Mercurial also comes with a python web script, that gives

[fossil-users] The hooks issue

2011-07-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:18:11PM +0100, Eric wrote: which leaves us with should fossil have hooks which still leads to complex interface issues. Sorry if I open the issue again... but the only trouble is the Windows platform, on spawning processes without terminals, isn't it? I once pointed

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile (Steve Bennett)

2011-07-21 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:26:25AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.auwrote: On 21/07/2011, at 5:24 PM, Ben Summers wrote: Probably makes sense to rename Makefile to Makefile.classic and have configure create Makefile from

Re: [fossil-users] Avoiding problems with fossil default Makefile (Steve Bennett)

2011-07-21 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:47:23AM -0400, Martin S. Weber wrote: On 07/21/11 09:34, Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/07/2011, at 10:43 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossellvirik...@gmail.com wrote: Just to understand the situation... fossil 1.18 has a broken configure script, right? It fails for me

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit : Answering the question about breaking existing scripts, the output is identical when used at the root. Unless you're running scripts in a sub-directory, nothing

Re: [fossil-users] changes status cmds within sub-directory

2011-07-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote: On 22 Jul 2011, at 12:03, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote: Le 2011-07-10 à 11:05, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk a écrit : Answering the question about breaking

Re: [fossil-users] Question on short-lived branches in fossil

2011-07-22 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:14:38PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote: It would be nice if branches had a default color distinct from the trunk. ... One way to do that that *might* be ... generate a hash of the branch tag

Re: [fossil-users] binary file

2011-07-25 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:18:32AM -0700, Zhang, Jenny wrote: Hi, I would like to find out if fossil can handle binary file which means can checkin and checkout a binary file? I use it with any kinds of files without trouble. Just you don't have 'diff' for binary files.

[fossil-users] Links to events

2011-07-26 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, long ago I opened this issue, about links to events not being resolved (thus appearing in read with no href). http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=b5efc3a47b I don't know if I should open a new issue... but the links still don't work at least for the timeline, checkins, or

Re: [fossil-users] Easily linking to events

2011-07-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:13:16PM -0500, Nolan Darilek wrote: My Fossil-based project is making a major release tomorrow, and I decided that warranted an event, particularly since the last such release was in November. :) I have a download page in the internal wiki, and I wanted to link to

Re: [fossil-users] Easily linking to events

2011-07-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:24:14AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/7/29 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com For the hooks, I remember as if the only issue was the windows platform. Is it the only issue? LOL! If the only issue was Windows it certainly would have been solved

[fossil-users] diff from to, weird result with 'diff -u' command

2011-07-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I'm using fossil diff --from XX --to YY, and the result is that the diff headers for each file refer to random names in /var/tmp, and only at the end I have a list of the files modified (unrelated to the random names). I think it is due to having 'diff-command = diff -u' in the settings.

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil destroys repositories?

2011-07-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Antoine Chavasse a.chava...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: About general reliability: I've never encountered any data

[fossil-users] zero artifacts, 6 deltas

2011-07-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, on a fossil sync, I just got this report: Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 130 1 0 0 Received:1504 33 0 0 Sent: 412 7 0 0 Received:9780

[fossil-users] Freshmeat

2011-07-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
I don't see fossil on freshmeat, and sqlite is not update since october 2010. Richard, wouldn't you like to add fossil there? I think it can bring people to the project. Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] commit command seems to be slow

2011-08-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:12:26AM +0200, Benoit Mortgat wrote: I am working on a very large fossil repository with approx. 20,000 files in it and several branches. Each time I run “fossil changes” it takes approximately 3 seconds to tell me what files are missing, deleted, added, or

Re: [fossil-users] commit command seems to be slow

2011-08-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:21:00PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/8/4 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com (btw, I never know what do I have to write to enable. 'on', '1', 'yes', ... and what to disable) Try 'fossil set' and use whatever it shows. 1 and 0 work for me. It shows

Re: [fossil-users] commit command seems to be slow

2011-08-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
. :) - Original Message - From: Wes Freeman Sent: 08/04/11 09:32 PM To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] commit command seems to be slow 2011/8/4 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:21:00PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/8/4

Re: [fossil-users] database locked on sync

2011-08-06 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 09:47:10AM -0700, Kevin Quick wrote: $ fossil sync PATH-TO-REPO Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent:3897 82 0 0 Error: Database error: database is locked DELETE FROM unclustered WHERE rid IN (SELECT rid

Re: [fossil-users] database locked on sync

2011-08-06 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
, maybe 'fossil open -keep' can help. But I never tried it. On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 10:04:32 -0700, Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 09:47:10AM -0700, Kevin Quick wrote: $ fossil sync PATH-TO-REPO Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas

Re: [fossil-users] Any way to create a branch *not* derived from any other branch?

2011-08-07 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 10:21:18AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote: I'm in the habit of keeping a good number of completely independent projects in a single fossil db. This is a hold over from how I used to use monotone. These are all very small projects that would be annoying to keeping in separate

Re: [fossil-users] database locked on sync

2011-08-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:36:29PM -0400, Martin S. Weber wrote: On 08/06/11 12:47, Kevin Quick wrote: $ fossil sync PATH-TO-REPO Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent:3897 82 0 0 Error: Database error: database is locked

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:58:02AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:28 AM, tpero...@compumation.com tpero...@compumation.com wrote: Change the subject: Please help me to understand why people want to create a new branch before adding changes to that branch, rather than

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:06:23PM +0800, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant wrote: Personally, this is a habit I bring from git, mainly because I'm not aware of any other way to doing things. I was not aware of fossil commit -branch new-branch, seems like a much better alternative. Half the time

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:27:09AM -0400, Joshua Paine wrote: On 8/9/2011 11:19 AM, Matt Welland wrote: Note: It is annoying to me that fossil branch new foo won't simply branch from the current node. +1 By the way, how does update differ from co in your step 2 below? If you have no

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:01:55PM -0500, tpero...@compumation.com wrote: So, how do you move commits in the trunk to a new branch after the fact. Open the UI, click the checkin, then edit... and check the part about starts a new branch. Regards, Lluís. -Original Message- From:

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:33:19AM -0700, Gé Weijers wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Richard Hipp wrote: Change the subject:  Please help me to understand why people want to create a new branch before adding changes to that branch, rather than just waiting until they check-in their edits? 

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_BUSY: statement aborts at 2: [ROLLBACK]

2011-08-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Jos Groot Lipman wrote: fossil open ../monkey.fossil fossil add monkey.txt del monkey.txt echo Y|fossil commit -m Versie 2010 --tag v2010 --branch v2010 What do you intend to do with this? Maybe you should run fossil rm monkey.txt after the del?

Re: [fossil-users] SunOS 5.1 build?

2011-08-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:49:15PM -0400, Tomek Kott wrote: Hi folks, A request for those who are configure / make wizards: could someone provide me with a build of fossil from SunOS / sparcv9? Specifically 5.1. I don't have ssh access to the server, so I can't compile it myself. At least, I

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki formatting with empty lines

2011-08-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:24:38PM -0400, Tomek Kott wrote: you could turn off the wiki behavior by going to the UI, going to Admin Configuration, and then selecting the checkbox that says Use HTML... that will turn off all the wiki formatting except url (i.e. []) syntax. I think you can use

[fossil-users] Three new annoyances with fossil

2011-08-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, as I still don't trust that anyone looks at the ticket list, I decided to mention three new tickets I opened today about what I consider fossil problems: - fossil commit -user stopped working - merging a file change with an incoming file delete ends up in silent delete - lack of warning

[fossil-users] Too big memory requirements for 'annotate'

2011-08-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I've a repository with a file changed often (specifically, in 3276 checkins). The file has around 8000 lines (I think that none beyond 80 columns), and annotating it takes around 700MB of RAM. I was having lots of troubles trying to do this annotate in a system with 512MB of RAM, and I

[fossil-users] The 'check-out' and 'clone' user permissions

2011-08-30 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I never understood enough the difference between the 'checkout' and the 'clone' user permissions in fossil. Can someone explain why would someone have the cases of checkout and not clone or clone and not checkout? Thank you, Lluís. ___

[fossil-users] Branch 'artifact_description'

2011-08-31 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I've always found the artifact description information a bit confusing (it appears in the diff and artifact web ui pages). I prepared a branch where I formatted with lists that information, and sorted by filename and date. For me it would also be important to show the 'branch' of the

Re: [fossil-users] Branch 'artifact_description'

2011-08-31 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:26:44PM +0200, Carles Pagès wrote: Looks great to me! Nice! El 31 d’agost de 2011 11:36, Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com ha escrit: For me it would also be important to show the 'branch' of the checkins there, but I'd have to learn a bit more

[fossil-users] ip addresses not noted using https

2011-09-01 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
I found that fossil does not note the origin ip addresses where the artifacts are taken from, if they come through an https correction. I propose the fix in the branch 'ssl_peer_ip', that I could make work for ipv4-only. If someone knows how to do that for ipv6, don't hesitate. :) Regards,

[fossil-users] The autosetup, and readline

2011-09-01 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Does the autosetup detect 'readline' for all of you? For me, it says that it cannot find the 'readline' symbol in the lib. I've tried to understand the autosetup code, and I found a trick that makes it work, but I cannot tell why. In my case, autosetup is even not running the test for the

Re: [fossil-users] The autosetup, and readline

2011-09-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:13:43PM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: On 02/09/2011, at 7:43 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Does the autosetup detect 'readline' for all of you? For me, it says that it cannot find the 'readline' symbol in the lib. In my case, autosetup is even

Re: [fossil-users] The autosetup, and readline

2011-09-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 06:15:54PM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: Thanks. Can you test this patch for me it see if it helps? Now it outputs: Checking for zlib.h...ok Checking libs for inflateEnd...-lz Checking for system ssl...ok HTTP support enabled Checking for readline/readline.h...Checking

[fossil-users] Commit comments trying to produce ol

2011-09-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I tried to write this in a commit comment: # First Item # Second item And fossil thought those were comments to be ignored. Couldn't fossil simply ignore the lines with '#' as first character? or that has some disadvantadges? Thank you!

Re: [fossil-users] The autosetup, and readline

2011-09-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 07:43:21PM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: On 02/09/2011, at 6:24 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: It looks like it is not testing the symbol anymore. OK. Try this fix instead. It works, thank you! I use tclsh, because that's the only way to be able to run make test

[fossil-users] blob_zero, empty_blob and blob_reset

2011-09-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I think that the big amount of memory required by annotate happens due to a memory leak. Using valgrind confirmed me this. I came to a dead-end trying to understand the blob functions. I decide to enable the assert_blob_is_reset(x) And the assertion fails everywhere. I don't know how to

Re: [fossil-users] blob_zero, empty_blob and blob_reset

2011-09-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:29:23PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Hello, I think that the big amount of memory required by annotate happens due to a memory leak. Using valgrind confirmed me this. ... (I keep on working on this... let's see if I can get rid of the leaks after

Re: [fossil-users] blob_zero, empty_blob and blob_reset

2011-09-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:57:27PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:29:23PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: So, don't consider that branch with a working annotate. :) Anyway, I'd like someone to take a look at the heavy leaks, and to get an explanation on how

Re: [fossil-users] blob_zero, empty_blob and blob_reset

2011-09-06 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:45:46PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/9/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com Yesterday I achieved quite a working code, through the use of empty_blob (to overcome the assertion), changing some blob operations (solving some leaks), and freeing

Re: [fossil-users] internal error reporting changes

2011-09-07 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Martin S. Weber martin.we...@nist.govwrote: Thanks to cscope (http://cscope.sf.net), at least that part isn't hard (only cumbersome:). LOL! Anyone who's followed Linux' history closely the

Re: [fossil-users] Cannot merge due to a rename

2011-09-07 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:06:28PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: I'm doing in a branch: fossil merge trunk, and I get (in 1.18): [many updates] RENAME a.cmd - a2.cmd fossil: SQLITE_CONSTRAINT: abort at 34 in [UPDATE vfile SET pathname='a2.cmd', origname=coalesce(origname

Re: [fossil-users] Cannot merge due to a rename

2011-09-07 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:50:32PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:06:28PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: I'm doing in a branch: fossil merge trunk, and I get (in 1.18): [many updates] RENAME a.cmd - a2.cmd fossil: SQLITE_CONSTRAINT: abort

Re: [fossil-users] How to set up a server under nginx ?

2011-09-25 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 04:33:44PM +0800, i wrote: I don't want to use CGI, as it's already nginx running . so now I want to use nginx to set up the server for fossil and I don't know what to do. Thanks. What makes you think, that you don't want CGI? I'd say you want CGI, as long as nginx

[fossil-users] Hashes from fossil

2011-09-28 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, downloading a tarball for a fossil checkin, gives different file contents at every download I try. I'd like the tarball contents to be fixed for every checkin. Do you know if this can be done? Do you all would prefer having fixed contents? What makes the contents change at every download?

Re: [fossil-users] Hashes from fossil

2011-09-28 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:10:16AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: 2011/9/28 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com The zlib compressor adds a timestamp at the beginning. If you gunzip the tarballs, you'll find that they are identical. Hello, Can we set the timestamp at will, for example

Re: [fossil-users] Hashes from fossil

2011-09-28 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:53:18PM +0200, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: I already checked in a change that sets the timestamp based on the check-in time. But I like your patch better (since it is simpler). Hehe, I started writing something similar, but was scared away by many changes required

Re: [fossil-users] Scalability, a single file commit and lots of disk reads

2011-09-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:45:29PM +0800, mjbmik...@gmail.com wrote: It is the Windows version. I'm currently in the process of commiting a new 0 byte file to an existing 2GB repo and Windows task manager says that the fossil process has read 3GB of data since I issued the commit command

Re: [fossil-users] Protection against timing attacks

2011-09-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:15:55PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh dmi...@codingrobots.comwrote: The more eyes the better, as it touches login code. ...COMPARE(A, PASSWORD) returns FALSE in 0.1 msec, but COMPARE(P, PASSWORD)

Re: [fossil-users] Protection against timing attacks

2011-09-29 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh dmi...@codingrobots.comwrote: I posted a link about this concern: http://rdist.root.org/2010/01/07/timing-independent-array-comparison/ So why not simply add the following

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-01 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 02:14:38AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: Hi, all! Another minor milestone: the 2nd proof-of-concept non-HTML client, this time in Java. It's fairly basic, and only supports synchronous operation, but it's a start. Sorry, not that I care much about JSON, but can json be

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-01 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:12:51AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/10/1 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com Sorry, not that I care much about JSON, but can json be used in a way that a program *spawns* fossil and talks to it using json, until it decides it's enough and fossil

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-01 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:23:32AM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/10/1 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com But that's only a hack. The spawner will not know when the server will be listening. And killing it, will not know if anyone else uses it and it is working. i don't see

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 03:07:52PM +0200, Paul Ruizendaal wrote: Maybe you could do some http-over-stdin/stdout, and speak json there. :) Isn't fossil cgi already doing that? A front-end could build the appropriate environment variables and fork/exec fossil cgi, feeding the post body to

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 09:55:36AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Paul Ruizendaal p...@planet.nl wrote: after every command fossil runs, exit() is called somewhere, which makes it difficult or impossible to chain commands together in the same app session.

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:22:28PM +0200, Paul Ruizendaal wrote: Doing fork/exec sounds expensive, but on a posix box there is not much difference between that and spawning a thread:

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 12:33:08PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/10/2 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com As for leaks, the memory leak about annotate was at every checkin traversed, though. Does the change in that branch look fine for a merge? Just to be clear - that's

Re: [fossil-users] minor milestone: Java client

2011-10-02 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 12:43:25PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: They can be forgotten because of exit(), not fork(). fork() will duplicate leaked memory but exit() will clean it up. Well, I meant that. I just wanted to state the difference about those and the 'annotate leak'. Yes, it

[fossil-users] Forms are cleared in firefox, switch pages

2011-10-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, sometimes I'm filling a ticket, and I click to some link by error, and then I use back/forward to go to the ticket form page again. And the form is blank. Firefox uses to store the form contents along page back/forward, but it fails to do so for fossil. Can this be 'fixed'? Anyone aware

[fossil-users] Event pages can't have attachments

2011-10-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, as event pages should be similar to wiki pages, shouldn't they allow attachments? Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

2011-10-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:19:34PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:00:14 +0530 ashish...@lostca.se (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote: [...] 2. IPv6 support. Fossil uses IPv4 sockets by default. I was not sure if there was any technical reason to not add support for IPv6, so

Re: [fossil-users] Forms are cleared in firefox, switch pages

2011-10-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:43:39PM +0200, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: sometimes I'm filling a ticket, and I click to some link by error, and then I use back/forward to go to the ticket form page again. And the form is blank. Firefox uses to store the form contents along page back/forward,

Re: [fossil-users] Forms are cleared in firefox, switch pages

2011-10-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:34:19PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/10/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com Small research about the trouble: Cache-Control: no-store http://blogs.atlassian.com/developer/2007/12/cachecontrol_nostore_considere.html https://jira.atlassian.com

Re: [fossil-users] Forms are cleared in firefox, switch pages

2011-10-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:05:13PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/10/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com What would happen if JSON answers had not 'no-store'? Would not be 'no-cache' enough? It should be up to the json clients though. Sorry, my mistake - i meant no-cache

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

2011-10-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:58:08AM -0700, Gé Weijers wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Additionally, I don't know how portable it is to use always getaddrinfo (POSIX-2001?) while requiring C89. C89 does not address networking, so this issue is unrelated to C89

Re: [fossil-users] [vb.net] Which files/folders can be safely ignored?

2011-10-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:54:13AM +0200, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:59:13 +0200, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: I'd like to start using Fossil to monitor Vb.Net (2008 Express) projects, and need to know which files/folders I can safely ignore when using the add command.

Re: [fossil-users] Listing artifact IDs for shunning?

2011-10-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:49:15PM +0200, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 08:45:44 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Don't do that. The purpose of Fossil is to remember, not to forget. I understand the reason, but I would still like to use this feature. How can I get a list of

Re: [fossil-users] fossil: out of memory

2011-10-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 05:47:37PM +0200, Jiří Navrátil wrote: fossil sync Server:http://myname@192.168.1.249:8098 Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 648 12 0 0 Received: 898 11 0 1 Total

Re: [fossil-users] SSL: cannot connect to host www.fossil-scm.org:443

2011-10-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 08:40:20PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: $ openssl s_client -host www.fossil-scm.org -port 443 CONNECTED(0003) write:errno=104 $ grep -w 104 /usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h #define ECONNRESET 104 /* Connection reset by peer */ It works for me here.

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011-10-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 04:15:10PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote: And that's what I don't understand, how could the Update overwrote your changes. This is from the update help command *Change the version of the

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:34:06PM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote: You shun a commit or a file in a commit? Is in fossil the shun generating a different commit? you can delete with git files that has history with git

Re: [fossil-users] Specifying files on the command line

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:12:49PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: There is a fossil-dev mailing list now. I added it to this thread - to see if it actually works. Assuming the new mailing list does work, we should try to move these kinds of discussions there, to minimize the noise for people how

[fossil-users] Shunning for testing

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, if I shun any contents from a repository, and rebuild... can I later 'unshun' them, and then expect a 'pull' to get them from whatever repository containing them? Regards, Lluís ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

[fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:06:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: 2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com: git looks to me as a tool for publishing development steps, not necessarily very related to the development history. The 'git version graph' is determined by the users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil: out of memory

2011-10-06 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:42:07AM +0200, Jiri Navratil wrote: I upgraded to This is fossil version 1.19 [080d27a6b2] 2011-10-05 08:00:00 UTC Not sure, what I shall do in gdb. So I have this. Please let me know, what next I can trace. Sorry fossil(2681) malloc: ***

Re: [fossil-users] What's goning on ? why warnings ?

2011-10-06 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 05:22:35PM +0800, i wrote: [ijse@~/Desktop/WorkTable/WatchWizard]$ fossil changes EDITED src/js/controller/AppController.js [ijse@~/Desktop/WorkTable/WatchWizard]$ (exe:6061): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead This output is not from fossil. I bet it's

Re: [fossil-users] Linking to fossil.exe [Re: GUI client for Windows?]

2011-10-06 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 04:18:27PM +0100, Jacek Cała wrote: Is this too much hassle to improve the exec in this matter? As said @Stephan, I think that this option is much more viable than using any intermediaries like standard output/error, protocol buffers or JSON API. What do you think? I

Re: [fossil-users] fossil: out of memory

2011-10-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:24:45PM +0200, Jiri Navratil wrote: Ooops. I had to discover this myself. Sorry The memory looks totally broken. Maybe you would have to run it inside valgrind. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Gdiff after commited files?

2011-10-11 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:11:18PM +0200, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:17:27 +0200, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: I'd also like to really check out the two versions into a directory. 2. Use fossil artifact to check out each revision: Ah great. I wanted some kind of 'svn cat'

Re: [fossil-users] Honor REMOTE_USER by default?

2011-10-11 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:59:16PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: If you are using .htaccess style authentication for a Fossil instance on a website, you have to check the Allow REMOTE_USER authentication box on the /Admin/Access page to enable it. That's a little obscure. I wonder if we should

Re: [fossil-users] Login seems to be broken. (Showstopping)(Solved)

2011-10-14 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:54:16AM +0800, Michael Richter wrote: After a lot of hair-pulling, the problem was solved. The issue is, as is usual for me, the Great Firewall. I have a back door to get around it, but that back door's pipeline is a bit narrow so I don't use it for all web sites.

[fossil-users] target diffwindow - annoying to me

2011-10-14 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, The timeline links [view] and [diff] use the target=diffwindow (introduced by drh in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/ci/6d9bba56dcdcad806a2e8672fe3835d04fad76c2 ) I really dislike the browser opening a new window for that. I'm very used to browser's back-forwards, and having that target

Re: [fossil-users] target diffwindow - annoying to me

2011-10-14 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:45:26AM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:38:37PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: The timeline links [view] and [diff] use the target=diffwindow (introduced by drh in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/ci

Re: [fossil-users] locking down tags, or at least capturing their state at a point in time ...

2011-10-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 07:16:47PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Perhaps tag changes should be displayed on the timeline? Tag changes now appear on the timeline. You'll need to recompile the latest trunk check-in and

Re: [fossil-users] adding empty directory to repository

2011-10-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0200, Jiri Navratil wrote: Hello, How I can add empty directory to repository? fossil add is not doing that for me. Fossil manages files, and files inside directories, but not directories. Regards, Lluís. ___

Re: [fossil-users] Strange behavior: unable to open fossil projects

2011-10-18 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:44:06AM +0100, David Bovill wrote: Has anyone else seen this before, and what is the safe way to delete a fossil repository without causing this behavior. At the moment I am just deleting the repository file, and letting fossil do its magic. I think there is only

[fossil-users] Veracity (was: Fwd: suggestion on fossil)

2011-10-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:18:01AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Yujianbin yujian...@huawei.com (2) support lock command, http://veracity-scm.org has this command. As Yujianbin mentions veracity... I saw some videos about veracity. From the web

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity

2011-10-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Ron Aaron wrote: And furthermore, how exactly do locks work in a distributed SCM context? (that was my 2 NIS)

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity

2011-10-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:26:23AM -0500, Eric Sink wrote: You can get the book in HTML, PDF or EPUB here: http://www.ericsink.com/vcbe/ I was sure you were in this list ;) Thank you for the link! On 10/19/11 7:56 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/10/19 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity

2011-10-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:21:55AM -0500, Eric Sink wrote: IMO anyone who _thinks_ they need them is still living in the 1980's or early 1990's. Tell that to the gaming companies. They use version control, and their repositories contain large numbers of very large binary files

Re: [fossil-users] Locks (Was: Veracity)

2011-10-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 09:38:44AM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: This requires a lot of work on fossils part in order to be reliable. Unlike source changes, you can't do a commit and then require a merge before pushing if there's a collision. There are also nasty restrictions on how you do things.

Re: [fossil-users] Locks (Was: Veracity)

2011-10-19 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:27:56PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: 2011/10/19 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com the file, and that also has only an informative role. Maybe something like propagated tags could mark files as needs_lock, and act accordingly on updates/checkouts

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity (was: Fwd: suggestion on fossil)

2011-10-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:42:21PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Michael Barrow mich...@barrow.me wrote: No -- please no locks! Concur. Locks are out-of-band for Fossil. If anybody thinks they really, really need locks, I'll be happy to offer them a

[fossil-users] More thoughts on locks

2011-10-20 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Thinking as if we had to implement locks some day... I just thought that we could have locks working not on file-paths-in-branch, but on artifacts. That would expand well to multiple branches. Then, if anyone gets the lock, and commits a new version, it could get locked automatically too,

<    1   2   3   4   5   >