Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Steve Schow wrote: > > Today I tried to check something in to the master repository, but even after > going to one of the others and running fossil sync, the change doesn’t show > up there…am I forgetting something? What does “fossil set autosync” say? ___

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > well…its not for a website…javascript is used for a lot of stuff out there > besides the web. Its not practical for the name of the file to have a > version encoded into it. Easily solved. During the “generate deployment package” step, crea

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > yea that’s way overkill. The attached script creates versioned zip files given a Fossil-versioned file name containing the file and a manifest file called VERSION. You can therefore get the version number in the file name and in the VERSION

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > I will try to find a solution outside of fossil. The ship script gets you 95% of the way there. For example, if you absolutely positively had to have the version number embedded into the deployed JS file, you could substitute it into the ship

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > its way overkill to have to follow any kind of build or deployment process > whatsoever for these scripts. One other thing: you had to have some kind of step to deploy these. If it’s just a “cp” command, build that into a modified version

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > no matter what I have tried to add enumeration lists in my fossil tickets, > the ticket comment is still coming up without any formatting. There are two ways I can see that happening: 1. You didn’t select Wiki from the “Format” drop-down. The

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > if each script file has its own independent version, its not part of a > greater whole per say…its just the version of that exact file..nothing > more……appearing in the source comment. My ship script doesn’t care about “greater wholes”. It e

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > yes the wiki menu item is selected > > yes no blank lines are present, still getting unformatted results. for > example > > This is some paragraph > # item one > # item two > > this results in: > > This is some paragraph # item one #

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:23 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > I have tried with a blank line between the paragraph and the list also, same > result. yes I am making sure always that the wiki menu item is selected Here’s a freshly-created Fossil repository with one ticket, formatted as you ask: htt

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > i’m getting the same result with new tickets, or adding on to tickets, makes > no difference. Send back the changed repository so that I (or someone else) can examine it. ___ fossil-users mailing lis

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > Here’s a freshly-created Fossil repository with one ticket, formatted as you > ask: > >https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6JrNPgaCV7RYldEc0d6MnpXTGc I apologize to those who have tried the link since I created it: I f

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

2017-08-15 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 15, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > well figured it out.. for some reason my main repository had the following > is it possible to have a diagram on my wiki page without that HTML option > checked? Fossil Wiki syntax accepts HTML tags. See: https://www.fossil-scm.org/in

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

2017-08-23 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 23, 2017, at 7:21 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 8/23/17, j. van den hoff wrote: >> unable to create directory /var > > It is trying to create a temporary file in which to store the one of > the two sides of the diff. Can you trace the problem by running in a > debugger? This sounds li

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil-dev] Backout the --no-dir-symlinks option. Was strange problem with graphical diff

2017-08-24 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 24, 2017, at 6:21 AM, David Mason wrote: > > I want a symlink to behave in fossil like it does in the Unix find command - > i.e. stop at a symlink without a --follow switch +1: principle of least surprise. Fossil should not invent new semantics. > like it does in the Unix tar command (

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned file replacement is broken?

2017-08-29 Thread Warren Young
On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:59 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > > But if you don't sync between removal and add, the 0 bytes bug is happening. I’ve seen this, too, but didn’t report it because there is the workaround you’ve discovered. ___ fossil-users mailing list fos

Re: [fossil-users] Empty file constantly being deleted

2017-09-07 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 7, 2017, at 4:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/help?cmd=ignore-glob for the > documentation on the ignore-glob setting. I confess that the > documentation is a bit thin at the moment and needs enhancement, but > it is what we have for now. The globbing rul

Re: [fossil-users] Shameless self-promotion

2017-09-15 Thread Warren Young
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > I would like to have a stronger argument against rebasing, preferrably with > an example. It’s been hashed over here on the mailing list many times before. Just search the archives for “git rebase”. The short argument I prefer to use is

Re: [fossil-users] Ignoring files/directories in automated zip files?

2017-09-19 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 18, 2017, at 6:49 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > > I'm looking at ignoring some files when an archive (zip/tarball) is created > by Fossil. What’s a good example where you’d want to do that? If anything, I find Fossil zip/tarball to produce *less* than I want in a release tarball, lacking things

Re: [fossil-users] Ignoring files/directories in automated zip files?

2017-09-19 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 19, 2017, at 3:22 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > > But I'm not sure if I want to implement that in Fossil just because another > unrelated piece of software makes bad decisions… I think you have *two* uses of zip/tarball here, not one: Fossil’s built-in mechanism for providing checkouts to people

Re: [fossil-users] Ignoring files/directories in automated zip files?

2017-09-20 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:32 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > /first-10-checkins /timeline?n=10&a=1970-01-01 You could also use this for Tickets reports: /bugs /rptview?rn=3 /wishlist /rptview?rn=2 Those being the report IDs of my Feature_Requests a

Re: [fossil-users] Continued issues with read-only repository

2017-09-21 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > > xyzzy...Nothing happens. You win 10 geek points today. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil backup snapshots using Tarsnap

2017-09-26 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 26, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > > sqlite3 /mnt/kd/fossil/astlinux.fossil .dump > > "$CUSTOM_BACKUP_DIR/astlinux.fossil.dump” [snip] > This seems to work well with limited testing ... Am I missing anything ? That’s more or less what we do here for our off-site backups. T

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil backup snapshots using Tarsnap

2017-09-26 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > > # fossil sqlite3 --version -R /mnt/kd/fossil/astlinux.fossil > 3.17.0 2017-02-13 16:02:40 ada05cfa86ad7f5645450ac7a2a21c9aa6e57d2c That would be Fossil 2.0, a transitional release meant to ease the move from Fossil 1.x to 2.x. Why run th

Re: [fossil-users] enhanced-symlink branch

2017-10-16 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 14, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > Please review the enhanced-symlink branch. Aside from a manifest.symlinks file appearing at the project root, what should we see? How do we test it? For example, if I declare a file to be a symlink in the repository by editing that file, what

Re: [fossil-users] enhanced-symlink branch

2017-10-16 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 16, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Arseniy Terekhin wrote: > > What should "ln" do on FAT16/32 and exFAT filesystems? Well, I'd just expect > fossil to not bother creating any links and maybe give a warning. Or, write two copies of the file, then on checkin either: a) take the later of the two files

Re: [fossil-users] enhanced-symlink branch

2017-10-16 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 16, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > I don't have the luxury of Cygwin because my end users won't have it. You can just distribute the DLL, then. In cases where your users *may* have Cygwin installed, it is considered polite to install the DLL only when it doesn’t already exist on

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil README symlink

2017-10-18 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 17, 2017, at 7:12 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > requiring JavaScript access has proven to be > fatal for his project's usage of Fossil. I noticed a complete lack of “me, too” in that thread. Usually when one of the other VCSes does something different from Fossil, people are quick to jump on

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil README symlink

2017-10-18 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 18, 2017, at 3:44 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > The more web apps that ship with stringent Content-Security-Policy headers, > the fewer arguments we’ll have for allowing JS on web pages. Wow…caffeine isn’t working yet, obviously. What I meant to say is that the more web site

Re: [fossil-users] Content-Security-Policy Was: Fossil README symlink

2017-10-18 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 18, 2017, at 7:04 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 10/18/17, Warren Young wrote: >> On Oct 18, 2017, at 3:44 AM, Warren Young wrote: >>> >>> The more web apps that ship with stringent Content-Security-Policy >>> headers, the fewer arguments

Re: [fossil-users] Content-Security-Policy Was: Fossil README symlink

2017-10-18 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 18, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2017, at 7:04 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> I'll have to add a "/fossil.js” resource While you’re about it, I’d suggest shipping /fossil-$hash.js instead and setting a multi-year Expires header for the file so

Re: [fossil-users] Content-Security-Policy Was: Fossil README symlink

2017-10-18 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 18, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > > style-$hash2.css where $hash2 is a hash (or prefix thereof) > of the contents of style.css, possibly combined with the Fossil checkin > prefix. If style.css is stored as a Fossil artifact, we get that for free. If it’s stored in SQL, Fossil coul

[fossil-users] README Maturity Model & CI/automated testing

2017-10-27 Thread Warren Young
Someone wrote up a document laying out opinions about how “mature” a given software project’s top-level README file is: https://github.com/LappleApple/feedmereadmes/blob/master/README-maturity-model.md It’s good food for thought, except insofar as it confuses “GitHub” with “the way softwar

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

2017-11-06 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 3, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 11/3/17, Olivier R. wrote: >> >> >> Sorry. My knowledge of the C toolchain is null. > > The next step will be to figure out > how to attach the debugger to a hung process. Problem #1 could be fixed (in principle) without any more help f

Re: [fossil-users] configure option --with-tcl no longer accepts a path

2017-11-08 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 8, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >> -with-tcl=path=> {Enable Tcl integration, with Tcl in the >> specified path} >> +with-tcl:path=> {Enable Tcl integration, with Tcl in the >> specified path} autosetup 0.6.8 changes this again, dropping “with/without

Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with git. (fwd)

2017-11-14 Thread Warren Young
I add a line explaining the file’s provenance to the module’s header comment: Merged from foo.c and bar.c on 2017.11.14 by Warren Young or Extracted from foo.c on 2017.11.14 by Warren Young Between that and the checkin comments near that date, I can backtrace merges and splits manually.

Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with git. (fwd)

2017-11-14 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 14, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > What Fossil could backtrace automatically, and still doesn’t, are renames. > Change a file’s name and the “finfo” terminates at the rename point. To clarify: I realize that Fossil *remembers* each rename. What I’m wishing fo

Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with git. (fwd)

2017-11-14 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 14, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Warren Young wrote: > https://tangentsoft.com/pidp8i/finfo?name=libexec/mkos8 > > Don't take this the wrong way, but that is a mighty fine skin you have, sir. Thank you. It’s large

Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with git. (fwd)

2017-11-15 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 14, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 11/14/17, Warren Young wrote: >> >> If anyone wants it, they can consider it to be under the SIMH license: > > Can I make it would of the built-in skin options in Fossil? Flattered but baffled, I says “Yes.”

[fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
I see a new wiki article: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=Fossil-NG I’m glad to see shallow and narrow clones being planned. The section on narrow clones should specify whether these can take on a life independent of the parent repository. That is, can they be used to shard

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 20, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I see a new wiki article: > >https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=Fossil-NG Shallow clones bear some thinking, too. Let us posit that “fossil clone” takes a -shallow option with no argument, telling it to fe

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 20, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > On 20/11/17 16:45, Carlo Miron wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >>> When the FILENAME parameter is not given, it produces a “Fossil” >>> subdirectory con

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 20, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > I thought that was the extension > the shallow cloned repository would get if no extension name was specified. If you say $ fossil clone https://fossil-scm.org fossil You get a repository file called “fossil”, not “foss

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 20, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > There is one more thing Git really gets right compared to Fossil: single-step > clone-and-open. We should be able to do the same: I’ve prototyped this as a simple shell script: #!/bin/sh -e url=$1 shift tmprepo=`mktemp

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 20, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > On 20/11/17 17:22, Warren Young wrote: >> On Nov 20, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas >> wrote: >>> I thought that was the extension >>> the shallow cloned repositor

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 20, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > Git allows you to do this in 2 steps: clone & cd. Fossil currently requires > 5, as I showed up-thread. 4 steps. The fifth step in the post starting this thread is part of a sepa

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-20 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 20, 2017, at 4:57 PM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > Why add more complexity and bloat to the Fossil core? Because interoperability. One of the major arguments against using Fossil is that it’s largely a one-way transition today, which messes up muscle memory for both Fossil parti

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 22

2017-11-21 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Ron W wrote: > > But, a "universal VCS adaptor" won't really be universal, so tool developers > will still end up supporting git, Hg and maybe SVN, so why would a tool > developer support Fossil-NG? Tool developers will ignore Fossil-NG to the same extent that they

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-21 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 21, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Ron W wrote: > > While I like the idea of a "smart default" for the file name, I'd rather have > an "--open" (or "-o") option to trigger the automatic "fossil open”. So…you want to remain more difficult to use than Git in this regard? That’s not very Fossil. (Yes,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-21 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 21, 2017, at 3:55 PM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:44:49 -0700 > Warren Young wrote: >> >> …muscle memory for both Fossil partisans and for partisans of other >> VCSes. > > This seems more like a complaint about t

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-21 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 21, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Zoltán Kócsi wrote: > > Adding unnecessary complexity to its innermost workings would open the > door to a maintenance hell, I think. If it were someone else proposing this feature as something for drh to do, then I might well agree with you, but since it is drh pro

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-21 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:21 PM, Zoltán Kócsi wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:42:56 -0700 > Warren Young wrote: > >> [...] >> >> There are some truly bletcherous C compilers in the embedded space. > > Well, I have some reservations about accepting that an

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-21 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > I don't see the point of raising this in the users list if > any voice we raise as users is answered as dumb or rudely by more > experienced users or devs. Since you’re replying to me, I can only take that reply as saying tha

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-22 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 22, 2017, at 7:43 AM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:42:56 -0700 > Warren Young wrote: > >>> This seems more like a complaint about the user interface. >> >> How does that observation get us to a different solution? >

Re: [fossil-users] Downloading from Fossil. Was: Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-22 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 22, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 11/22/17, Warren Young wrote: >> >> 1. Visit https://example.com >> 2. Click Timeline (and how would my users know to do that?) >> 3. Click checkin ID. >> 4. Find and click Tarball link >> 5. U

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-27 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 23, 2017, at 5:19 AM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > They want maximum results for minimum effort? That may be normal, but > it's still whiney. If “normal” is “whiney”, it ceases to be a useful disparagement unless you intend to change society. This mailing list is not a good place

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-27 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 24, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Which is better? > > A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline I prefer A because I don’t like having to dig for details. Hiding details isn’t the answer to clutter. Drawing the eye to key deta

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-27 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The big down-side is that less > information is visible on a single screen now, so you have to scroll > more. But that seems to be the trend with websites these days…. The design ideas I tapped into this were old when desktop publishing was t

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-27 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> The big down-side is that less >> information is visible on a single screen now, so you have to scroll >> more. But that seems to be the trend with website

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-28 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 27, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Steve Landers wrote: > > Note that I would retain the rounded corners on Warren’s backgrounds, they > make the visuals “softer”. You can have that without the stroked borders: td.timelineTableCell { border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f8f8f8; } That is, do

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-28 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 28, 2017, at 3:12 AM, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > I think the one important thing is that all involved HTML elements have a > 'class' or 'id' tag. Yes. Several times in making my last custom Fossil skin, I’ve had to employ some rather clever CSS selector trickery to target the elements I wa

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 28, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Mike Burns wrote: > > > You won't get Fossil/SQLite running on a Commodore 64 without a lot of work. > > What are the chances someone will take up take up this challenge, and have a > Commodore 64 or Apple II version of fossil up and running by the end of the > yea

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > There's a small display glitch, the mouse cursor over the > Basic/Advanced button is set to "text selection" mode instead of the > usual "hand with the index finger up" for clickable links. It can be fixed by adding href="#" into the element

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The "selected entry" highlighting, such as seen here: > >https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=trunk > > Still looks goofy in the Modern View, especially using Edge. Your > help in fixing that problem will be much appreciated. It

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > [*] To be clear, that means the element ends up with two classes. Even more clear: ... td.timelineSelected { border-width: 2px; background-color: #ffc; box-shadow: 4px 4px 2px rgba(0, 0,

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > >> It can be fixed by adding href="#" into the elements > > Using "Inspect" on chrome, I found that adding: > > cursor: pointer; > > inside "element.style" fix the problem. That feels more heavy-handed to me. My method works with the br

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 11/29/17, Warren Young wrote: >> >>https://imgur.com/a/TEWjA > > I think we'd like the selection mechanism to somehow highlight the > entire row I don’t think it really helps, but thi

Re: [fossil-users] CSP for Fossil. Was: A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Apparently what I would need to do is generate HTML without all of the > onclick= and style= attributes Yes. > but make sure every element has an id= attribute. Or at least a class attribute, when you want multiple elements to have the same

Re: [fossil-users] Weird behavior on Chisel, perhaps a version mismatch?

2017-11-29 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 29, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:02:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: >> On 11/29/17, Jacob MacDonald wrote: >>> Ah, I see. It seems strange to me that the policy didn't get set when I >>> cloned. How can I avoid the same thing in the future and

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

2017-11-30 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 30, 2017, at 8:16 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > >mkcss.exe ..\src\default_css.txt default_css.h > ..\src\default_css.txt:1: syntax error Has src/default_css.txt changed? Try reverting it. The fact that you have an evolving stream of different errors is a big concern. Why isn’t th

Re: [fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

2017-11-30 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 30, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Marc Simpson wrote: > > Re: CSS issues: I think the default skin would be a bit more readable > with 1 or 2 pixels of space between these newly added commit > bubbles/boxes. > > (Adjacency currently yields a doubly thick shared line.) My original design had about 2

Re: [fossil-users] Forgotten "Fossil 1.x" comment in add.c

2017-12-05 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 2, 2017, at 5:00 AM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > What's up with this comment in add.c starting at line 27: It was written back when “Fossil 2.0” meant something different from what we now call “Fossil 2.0”: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=Fossil+2.0 At minim

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil in Debian

2017-12-05 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 5, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Roy Keene wrote: > > Version 2.2 is in Debian testing, has been for a while. Thank you for chasing this on the back-channel, Roy. It’s good to know that there is a binary version of Fossil 2.x in Debian current already, if you absolutely cannot use one of the offic

Re: [fossil-users] Forgotten "Fossil 1.x" comment in add.c

2017-12-05 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 5, 2017, at 8:47 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > At minimum, that wiki article should be renamed Never mind. I see now that the page is being maintained under its current name to avoid breaking existing links on the web. ___ fossil-users m

Re: [fossil-users] How to disable crlf warning permanently

2017-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 6, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > > 2017-12-06 10:03 GMT+01:00 Scott Doctor: >> >> How can I permanently turn off the crlf warning that occurs when I do I do a >> commit without having to use the crlf-glob command each time? I do not get >> why that warning even exists. > > Jus

Re: [fossil-users] How to disable crlf warning permanently

2017-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 6, 2017, at 2:03 AM, Scott Doctor wrote: > > I do not get why that warning even exists. Because people working on cross-platform projects often have one user (there’s always one) who opens a text file with Unix line endings on a Windows box and commits it with DOS line endings, thus pot

Re: [fossil-users] Lots of web interface changes

2017-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 6, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > (6) CSP headers says: "default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline’". Don’t undersell the advantages. That’s a significant improvement already: 1. It disallows all eval() cases, which closes off a whole class of attacks. 2. It disallows active conte

Re: [fossil-users] Lots of web interface changes

2017-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 6, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Sean Woods wrote: > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki > > See that ugly "index.html" in the URL? Was that always there? Yes, it was: https://web.archive.org/web/20151225132659/http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/i

Re: [fossil-users] How to revert a wiki page to a specific revision

2017-12-07 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 7, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > I have been looking in the help on revert, but it seems related to files > and I wonder which is the command to revert a wiki page from it > particular version to some previous one. > > Now that web interface is changing, may

Re: [fossil-users] TAB size in displayed content

2017-12-11 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 10, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Thomas wrote: > > the reason why horizontal tabs in artifacts are 8 characters wide is because > { tab-size: 4; } doesn't appear. > > Wouldn't it make sense to add this so that the /artifact, /fdiff etc pages > fall back to 4 instead of 8? Tabs at a multiple of 8

Re: [fossil-users] trouble cloning current fossil-scm.org repo with old fossil (2015)

2017-12-11 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 10, 2017, at 7:40 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > > Thus said Richard Hipp on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 19:20:59 -0500: > >> Minor correction: the hash algorithm changes was from SHA1 to >> SHA3-256. > > I would call that a major correction! I knew something didn't seem right > about what I s

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

2017-12-11 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 11, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Florian Balmer wrote: > > So my strategy here was to argue for a generally accepted default that > would be built into Fossil ;-) Switch to Modern view? :) ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org htt

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

2017-12-11 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 11, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Rolf Ade wrote: > > Florian Balmer writes: >> I didn't want to spend my hobby time with CSS >> diffing. > > ...having own > skins and CSS as branch of the main trunk(s) (the build-in skins) and to > be able to merge the own skins/CSS from the build-in skins, as they

Re: [fossil-users] TAB size in displayed content

2017-12-11 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 11, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Thomas wrote: > > On 2017-12-11 21:47, Warren Young wrote: >> Try this > echo -e "\tHi" | cat > > Tried it just now. The leading $ means it’s intended to be understood as a Bourne shell command. The point remains true in Windows, ho

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

2017-12-11 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 11, 2017, at 5:03 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > A new version of Fossil is up with some minor UI tweaks: > > (1) No more box around comments in the Modern and Columnar views. > Instead, the background color is a light gray. Works for me, though maybe a slightly lighter gray, barely percept

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

2017-12-11 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 11, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Steve Landers wrote: > > The slightly lighter gray has the downside of not being visible by many folk > with diminished contrast perception. I’d worry more about poor quality monitors that either have poor white clipping behavior or off-axis brightness problems. A

Re: [fossil-users] fossil rm --hard dir1

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Tino Lange wrote: > > The directory/directories will keep existing! Given that Fossil doesn’t know anything about directories, other than as containers for the files it manages, I’m not sure that isn’t the right thing. To have Fossil remove intermediate directories

Re: [fossil-users] -db-check compression ratio

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > * The first is the inclusion of un-versioned files which although inflate the > total file size have no play in the versioning part, which is what I believe > the compression ratio was meant to highlight. If unversioned file data isn’t

[fossil-users] Bug: fossil rebuild loops indefinitely if -R file cannot be opened

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
I just tried to rebuild a Fossil repo that I’d lost permission to read due to some sysadmin silliness, and got spammed by this in a rapid loop: PRAGMA database_list SQLITE_CANTOPEN: cannot open file at line 36229 of [1a584e4999] SQLITE_CANTOPEN: os_unix.c:36229: (2) open(/nunya/binness.fossil-wal

Re: [fossil-users] TAB size in displayed content

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Thomas wrote: > > On 2017-12-11 22:55, Warren Young wrote: >> notepad.exe and Internet Explorer also obey the 8-character tab standard. >> Go tell Microsoft it is wrong, too. > > I'm not sure how many people use notepad.exe to

Re: [fossil-users] How to share a fossil repo using static http (without the cgi)?

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 12, 2017, at 12:33 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > I want share a fossil repo using a static http server Call something like this from a crontab: $ wget -O /var/www/html/dl/my-project.zip http://localhost:8080/zip Then in the HTML: Download > I want share only t

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. GitHub

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Would Git or GitHub have told me about those prior tickets? GitHub is pretty good about surfacing such information, as long as the ticket references the checkin ID. In fact, GitHub can be a bit overeager about cross-linking everything. Ju

Re: [fossil-users] Bug: fossil rebuild loops indefinitely if -R file cannot be opened

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:26 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > ...I’d lost permission to read... > > SQLITE_CANTOPEN: os_unix.c:36229: (2) open(/nunya/binness.fossil-wal) - No > such file or directory Actually, it looks like it’s opening the DB for reading but then fails to write the W

Re: [fossil-users] fossil rm --hard dir1

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2017, at 1:03 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > On 13 December 2017 at 07:58, Warren Young wrote: > >> I’d feel differently if Fossil owned the directories, but it doesn’t. >> They’re mine; leave them alone! > > Yes, I agree. I think this topic has b

Re: [fossil-users] Bug: fossil rebuild loops indefinitely if -R file cannot be opened

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 12/13/17, Warren Young wrote: >> I just tried to rebuild a Fossil repo that I’d lost permission to read due >> to some sysadmin silliness, and got spammed by this in a rapid loop: >> >> PRAGMA database_list &

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 11, 2017, at 9:19 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I’d go as far as #F8F8F8 myself. One of my Fossil projects’ skins is based on Khaki, which hasn’t yet been restyled to override the base styles for the timeline boxes, so I get light gray on yellow, not terribly attractive. The fol

Re: [fossil-users] fossil rm --hard dir1

2017-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Zakero wrote: > > The "fossil clean" command has the "--emptydirs" option. That might be > useful for the "rm" command as well. If Fossil got that option, I’d probably forget that it existed a week after the change went in. I’d end up saying something like $

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

2017-12-14 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:19 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > So Warren edited a file at the same exact time as tangent? Fossil arguably has a bug here, where if you check a change in as local user name “tangent”, as I do here, then *later* do a “fossil sync” to a URL with a user name, some bit of th

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

2017-12-18 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 17, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Kevin wrote: > > I believe deception and impersonation are important. I agree. One of the core tenets of Fossil is durable accountability, and here we have a case where it allows the who-did-what history to be muddied. What Fossil allowed in the case that started

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

2017-12-18 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 18, 2017, at 6:52 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > When gdb was active, Fossil didn’t answer when asking for a webpage. It > seemed blocked. That’s exactly what happens. If you want the process to run while GDB remains attached, say “cont” after attaching. > Here is what gdb said: Did it sa

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

2017-12-18 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 18, 2017, at 7:04 PM, bch wrote: > > Does contemporary Linux not randomize its PIDs? It may be an option, but it isn’t happening on a near-stock CentOS 7 box I have near at hand here: $ ls > /dev/null & echo $! Run that repeatedly on a quiet system, and chances are, you’ll get ste

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >