Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-22 Thread Wolfgang
Richard Hipp drh@... writes: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Francisc Simon francisc.si...@evalgo.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The only way, in Windows, that you can have a process started by a user continue running after logoff (i.e. what nohup does)

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-22 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Wolfgang wrote: I tried Dmitry Chestnykh's solution but i got some trouble, when the called process does subsequent 'system(...)'-calls - new DOS-boxes are flickering around. That was because I couldn't make it preserve input/output handles from the parent

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-22 Thread Wolfgang
Dmitry Chestnykh dmitry@... writes: On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Wolfgang wrote: I tried Dmitry Chestnykh's solution but i got some trouble, when the called process does subsequent 'system(...)'-calls - new DOS-boxes are flickering around. That was because I couldn't make it

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-22 Thread Wolfgang
Wolfgang ratwhs@... writes: Dmitry Chestnykh dmitry@... writes: On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Wolfgang wrote: I tried Dmitry Chestnykh's solution but i got some trouble, when the called process does subsequent 'system(...)'-calls - new DOS-boxes are flickering around.

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Francisc Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.01.2011 13:45, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Francisc Simon francisc.si...@evalgo.comwrote: Hi @all, i probably ask a question that was already asked before but i can not figure out from the

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Francisc Simon francisc.si...@evalgo.comwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The only way, in Windows, that you can have a process started by a user continue running after logoff (i.e. what nohup does) is to start it either through a

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Why not use threads? Perhaps you said this because you are aware of my opinion of threads and you just wanted to push my buttons? Ha! I'm on to your ruse and it won't work! Multi-threaded processes are supported on

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Nolan Darilek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2011 07:44 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: will be appreciated. Though, I suppose I could make these things a posix-only feature. That would be my vote, if in fact you are interested in taking votes. :) No sense in *everyone* missing out

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: But I did not accept that branch onto the trunk. I want to do the hooks via a different mechanism. But in order to implement this different mechanism, I need example C code for launching a background process in windows that is not

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Francisc Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.01.2011 21:36, Nolan Darilek wrote: On 01/21/2011 07:44 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: will be appreciated. Though, I suppose I could make these things a posix-only feature. That would be my vote, if in fact you are interested in taking