Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Hi, I can confirm that this speeds up things. Just noticed this thread and wondered if this could be as well the reason for my “slow" serving of unversioned files. When using docker images to host fossil, it uses fossil serve. I just compiled the latest trunk on my Raspberry Pi and created a

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

The latest trunk check-in on Fossil (http://www4.fossil-scm.org/info/05ec15cad53e8176) should do a much better job of handling load from "fossil server". Please compile and run it and let me know what happens. The www4.fossil-scm.org server is running as follows: /usr/local/bin/fossil

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

In message , Warren Young writes: >On Dec 22, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Olivier R. wrote: >> >> Le 22/12/2017 à 16:10, Warren Young a écrit : >>> 1. Your repo is public-facing. Is this a reasonable number of >>> clients to be

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 21:34, Richard Hipp a écrit : On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. https://www.scaleway.com/virtual-cloud-servers/ (The starter version at €2.99/month) I'm building up a new Fossil server on this VPS now - on an ARM64-2G

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 22:39, Richard Hipp a écrit : On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. Maybe you have used up your bandwidth quota and the ISP is throttling your connection? There is no bandwidth quota. And when I kill the processes and

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. Maybe you have used up your bandwidth quota and the ISP is throttling your connection? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: >> >> I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. >> https://www.scaleway.com/virtual-cloud-servers/ >> (The starter version at €2.99/month) >> > > I'm building up a new Fossil server on this VPS now

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I also run Fossil on a cheap VPS. > https://www.scaleway.com/virtual-cloud-servers/ > (The starter version at €2.99/month) > I'm building up a new Fossil server on this VPS now - on an ARM64-2G machine in Paris. It is slow-going.

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 18:41, Warren Young a écrit : I’ve added the user to the “wireshark” group, but it doesn’t work. You have to log out and back in before group changes will take effect. That’s what I did. But it didn’t work. So I used `lsof -i:8080` again. Here is the difference with the

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 19:57, Warren Young a écrit : On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Warren Young wrote: Olivier, what about memory usage for the Fossil processes? “top” can give you this. I just checked my public server, and each of the 4 Fossil instances is taking about 20 MB

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > Olivier, what about memory usage for the Fossil processes? “top” can give > you this. I just checked my public server, and each of the 4 Fossil instances is taking about 20 MB of VM, of which only about 800 kB is

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > I posted a long HOWTO about it back in June of 2016: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg23320.html I just realized that that message is a reply to my post, not the post itself.

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Tomek Kott wrote: > > FWIW I also run in server mode constantly because its easy. My users (there > are 10, they probably hit the server in bursts of 10 times one one day of the > week) occasionally notice slowdowns and ping me. When I

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

FWIW I also run in server mode constantly because its easy. My users (there are 10, they probably hit the server in bursts of 10 times one one day of the week) occasionally notice slowdowns and ping me. This is for an internal site only, no public facing, so shouldn't be huge numbers of users.

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > Le 22/12/2017 à 16:10, Warren Young a écrit : > >> 1. Your repo is public-facing. Is this a reasonable number of >> clients to be connected at any given time to this repo? It seems >> high to me, given the transient

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 16:10, Warren Young a écrit : 1. Your repo is public-facing. Is this a reasonable number of clients to be connected at any given time to this repo? It seems high to me, given the transient nature of most Fossil connections. Only two devs have the right to modify the online

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Hello all: In message

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > (afaik) nobody uses "fossil server" > for long-running websites. I do. Mine stay running for months at a time, including public-facing ones. > use the xinetd/inetd style of invoking Fossil I can only see that helping if

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I didn’t use Fossil 2.3 because the SQLite version bundled was in beta > stage. That is NOT a good reason to reject the use of Fossil 2.3. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > I’ll have to kill all these processes soon and relaunch Fossil. > I’ll do it when you think you have enough information about this > problem. I’ll use Fossil 2.4 next time. > Maybe there is some kind of issue in the HTTP server

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > I’ll have to kill all these processes soon and relaunch Fossil. > I’ll do it when you think you have enough information about this problem. My request for connection rates doesn’t require that you keep Fossil running — in

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 22/12/2017 à 15:59, Richard Hipp a écrit : On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: There is now more than 24 subprocesses of Fossil running, and it’s getting really slow. Are you saying that these 24 Fossils are spinning - using CPU cycles - not just hung waiting on I/O?

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:10 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > $ sudo tshark -b duration:1 port 8080 and tcp.flags.syn==1 | wc -l Sorry, that’s bogus. Try this instead: $ sudo tshark -i enp3s0 -w x.pcap -b duration:5 -a files:1 \ port 8080 and "tcp[tcpflags] & tcp-syn !=

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 22, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > Le 19/12/2017 à 21:49, Warren Young a écrit : > >> If it’s a sign of a bug, then it means something very bad has >> happened, like the network stack has lost track of its client >> somehow. To see that, you’d need to do a

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 12/22/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > There is now more than 24 subprocesses of Fossil running, and it’s > getting really slow. Are you saying that these 24 Fossils are spinning - using CPU cycles - not just hung waiting on I/O? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 19/12/2017 à 21:49, Warren Young a écrit : If it’s a sign of a bug, then it means something very bad has happened, like the network stack has lost track of its client somehow. To see that, you’d need to do a network capture on that fossil instance’s network sockets. Use netstat -nap or

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > If it’s a sign of a bug, then it means something very bad has happened, like > the network stack has lost track of its client somehow. To see that, you’d > need to do a network capture on that fossil instance’s network

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > #0 0x7fd8ff85e873 in __select_nocancel () at > ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 > #0 0x7fd8ff85e873 in __select_nocancel () at > ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 > #0 0x7fd8ff858ba0 in

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 19/12/2017 à 02:00, Warren Young a écrit : On Dec 18, 2017, at 6:52 AM, Olivier R. wrote: When gdb was active, Fossil didn’t answer when asking for a webpage. It seemed blocked. That’s exactly what happens. If you want the process to run while GDB remains attached,

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 18, 2017, at 7:04 PM, bch wrote: > > Does contemporary Linux not randomize its PIDs? It may be an option, but it isn’t happening on a near-stock CentOS 7 box I have near at hand here: $ ls > /dev/null & echo $! Run that repeatedly on a quiet system, and

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:19 AM Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 3, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > On 11/3/17, Olivier R. wrote: > >> > >> > >> Sorry. My knowledge of the C toolchain is null. > > > > The next step will be to

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 18, 2017, at 6:52 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > When gdb was active, Fossil didn’t answer when asking for a webpage. It > seemed blocked. That’s exactly what happens. If you want the process to run while GDB remains attached, say “cont” after attaching. > Here is

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

OK. It happened again while I was away for few days. The main process has created 10 subprocesses. Fossil was very slow. I used gdb on the main process. When gdb was active, Fossil didn’t answer when asking for a webpage. It seemed blocked. And Fossil was responsive again few seconds after I

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 06/11/2017 à 18:19, Warren Young a écrit : The remaining PIDs are all certainly a single parent with multiple children. You’d have to run top in “tree” mode or show the PPID column to find out which one is the parent. You can tell without doing that by the fact that all of the VIRT column

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Nov 3, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 11/3/17, Olivier R. wrote: >> >> >> Sorry. My knowledge of the C toolchain is null. > > The next step will be to figure out > how to attach the debugger to a hung process. Problem #1 could be

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 11/3/17, Olivier R. wrote: > Le 03/11/2017 à 10:22, Richard Hipp a écrit : >> On 11/3/17, Olivier R. wrote: >>> >>> And today, Fossil was already very slow and I discovered that there were >>> more than ten processes of Fossil running. >> >> Can you

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Le 03/11/2017 à 10:22, Richard Hipp a écrit : On 11/3/17, Olivier R. wrote: And today, Fossil was already very slow and I discovered that there were more than ten processes of Fossil running. Can you compile with symbols enabled ("-g") and then attach to one of the

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On 11/3/17, Olivier R. wrote: > > And today, Fossil was already very slow and I discovered that there were > more than ten processes of Fossil running. Can you compile with symbols enabled ("-g") and then attach to one of the hung processes using a debugger to see what it

[fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

Hi everyone, There is a fossil repo I run on a server since several months. And I noticed several times a behavior I don’t understand at all. After few months of running sweetly, I noticed that the fossil server was getting slower and slower. The repo is about 120 Mb only. Then I discovered