Re: [fossil-users] [fossil all extras] useless without --showfile

2014-04-03 Thread Andy Goth
On 4/2/2014 11:42 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: Andy Goth wrote: I'm curious how a script could make use of [fossil extras] without the benefit of the --showfile option. The --showfile option is processed by the [fossil all] command, not the [fossil extras] command, which basically explains the

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil all extras] useless without --showfile

2014-04-03 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Andy Goth wrote: A possible compromise is to have [fossil all] only give --header to [fossil extras] when [fossil all] was not given --showfile. I suggest this on the presumption that any existing scripts that actually use [fossil all extras] must use --showfile, because the output is

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil all extras] useless without --showfile

2014-04-02 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Andy Goth wrote: Without the --showfile option, [fossil all extras] just prints filenames relative to the directories in which the repositories were opened. It's anyone's guess which files go with which directories and which repositories. Additionally, --showfile prints the names of

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil all extras] useless without --showfile

2014-04-02 Thread Andy Goth
On 4/2/2014 7:47 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: Andy Goth wrote: I prefer the behavior of [fossil all changes]. By default it prints the names of both the repositories and directories with changes, plus doesn't print anything for directories with no changes. I would prefer to be consistent as

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil all extras] useless without --showfile

2014-04-02 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Andy Goth wrote: I'm curious how a script could make use of [fossil extras] without the benefit of the --showfile option. The --showfile option is processed by the [fossil all] command, not the [fossil extras] command, which basically explains the underlying issue... The [fossil extras]