-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/21/2014 11:48 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote:
does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having
each others remote-url? I can imagine things get a bit weird,
sync-tree wise, when more machines are involved, but I couldn't
think of a
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/21/2014 11:48 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote:
does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having
each others remote-url? I can imagine things get a bit weird,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 June 2014 18:48, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote:
does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each
others remote-url?
rephrase: ... having each other as remote-url (i.e. repo
Hello,
does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each
others remote-url? I can imagine things get a bit weird, sync-tree
wise, when more machines are involved, but I couldn't think of a
counter-argument for 2 machines. It's just that I've never seen such a
setup being
On 21 June 2014 18:48, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote:
does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each
others remote-url?
rephrase: ... having each other as remote-url (i.e. repo on box A has
the repo on box B as remote-url, and vice versa)
5 matches
Mail list logo