Re: [fossil-users] 2 repos being each others remote-url

2014-06-26 Thread Andy Goth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/21/2014 11:48 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each others remote-url? I can imagine things get a bit weird, sync-tree wise, when more machines are involved, but I couldn't think of a

Re: [fossil-users] 2 repos being each others remote-url

2014-06-26 Thread Andreas Kupries
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/21/2014 11:48 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each others remote-url? I can imagine things get a bit weird,

Re: [fossil-users] 2 repos being each others remote-url

2014-06-22 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 June 2014 18:48, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each others remote-url? rephrase: ... having each other as remote-url (i.e. repo

[fossil-users] 2 repos being each others remote-url

2014-06-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each others remote-url? I can imagine things get a bit weird, sync-tree wise, when more machines are involved, but I couldn't think of a counter-argument for 2 machines. It's just that I've never seen such a setup being

Re: [fossil-users] 2 repos being each others remote-url

2014-06-21 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 21 June 2014 18:48, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: does it make sense to have 2 repos on different machines having each others remote-url? rephrase: ... having each other as remote-url (i.e. repo on box A has the repo on box B as remote-url, and vice versa)