Re: [fossil-users] Branch and tag metadata

On 5/21/2016 6:27 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote: > In message <3d27b874-c4db-f4e9-956f-7bbfd651b...@gmail.com>, > Andy Goth writes: >> How about tags? Put the description in the check-in manifest of the >> first usage of the tag, I suppose. > > That's my thought. IIUC a property with no value is

Re: [fossil-users] Branch and tag metadata

Hi Andy: In message <3d27b874-c4db-f4e9-956f-7bbfd651b...@gmail.com>, Andy Goth writes: >On 5/21/2016 4:53 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote: >> In message , >> "Tony Papadimitriou" writes: >>> I've had the same wish for a long long time. I would >>> like

Re: [fossil-users] Branch and tag metadata

On 5/21/2016 4:53 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote: > In message , > "Tony Papadimitriou" writes: >> I've had the same wish for a long long time. I would like the FOSSIL BRANCH >> list to show except for the branch name some kind of description. >> Like you

Re: [fossil-users] Branch and tag metadata

Hi all: In message , "Tony Papadimitriou" writes: >I've had the same wish for a long long time. I would like the FOSSIL BRANCH >list to show except for the branch name some kind of description. >Like you mentioned, making the branch name itself long

Re: [fossil-users] Branch and tag metadata

if a branch is private. This would be very helpful to me (at least). Add another €0.01 -Original Message- From: Andy Goth Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 5:39 AM To: Fossil Users Mailing List Subject: [fossil-users] Branch and tag metadata I'm thinking I might want the ability to describe

[fossil-users] Branch and tag metadata

I'm thinking I might want the ability to describe branches and tags separate from the check-in comments. Maybe a wiki page with the same name as the branch or tag would serve the purpose, then in the wiki page there could be links to tickets or whatever else is needed to describe what is going