H is sufficient.
> I'm asking this because I wonder how will ssh and fossil
> share public/private keys, known_hosts, etc.
>
> - Altu
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathaniel R. Reindl
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Sent: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 2:44
keys, known_hosts, etc.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Nathaniel R. Reindl
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 2:44 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: ssh:// sync method
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Brian Smith
wrote:> I'd vote for changing
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 23:25:03 Richard Hipp wrote:
> The latest version of Fossil (in the self-hosting Fossil repository - not
> the precompiled binaries which are a little too old) supports a new method
> of pushing, pulling, cloning, and syncing using SSH. Examples:
>
> fossil clone
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
> I'd vote for changing this notation to a more standard scp style reference.
> I.e.: "usern...@hostname.com:local/path" or
> "usern...@hostname.com:/full/path".
> I've got no strong opinions as to whether or not ssh:// is at the
> front of thos
On 25/08/2010, at 3:46 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> The latest version of Fossil (in the self-hosting Fossil repository - not
>> the precompiled binaries which are a little too old) supports a new method
>> of pushing, pulling, cloning, and syn
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> The latest version of Fossil (in the self-hosting Fossil repository - not
> the precompiled binaries which are a little too old) supports a new method
> of pushing, pulling, cloning, and syncing using SSH. Examples:
>
> fossil clone ssh:
The latest version of Fossil (in the self-hosting Fossil repository - not
the precompiled binaries which are a little too old) supports a new method
of pushing, pulling, cloning, and syncing using SSH. Examples:
fossil clone ssh://usern...@hostname.com/local/path/repo.fossilex1.fossil
7 matches
Mail list logo
