Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.28 and SQLite 3.8.0.2

2014-01-28 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-01-28 James Turner: Thanks for the clarification guys. I'm thinking it's probably safe then to use 1.28 with our 3.8.0.2 version of SQLite. I'll get our in-tree version of SQLite upgraded to the latest after the unlock. Thanks for your feedback. It is highly appreciated! Regards,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.28 and SQLite 3.8.0.2

2014-01-27 Thread Richard Hipp
I think URL like:.../tree?ci=trunk will fail without 3.8.2. Your best bet is to compile without --disable-internal-sqlite and just let Fossil use the built-in version of SQLite. That will definitely be the safest and best tested approach. If you use --disable-interal-sqlite, you never know

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.28 and SQLite 3.8.0.2

2014-01-27 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote: 2014-01-27 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: I think URL like:.../tree?ci=trunk will fail without 3.8.2. This is the url which uses WITHOUT ROWID in trunk, but thanks to the SQLite version check it doesn't depend

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.28 and SQLite 3.8.0.2

2014-01-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-01-28 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: FWIW, Fossil 1.29 will very definitely require SQLite 3.8.3 or later in as much as it uses common table expressions to help generate the timeline now. Yes, and I'm looking forward to that! By the time that Fossil 1.29 will be released, SQLite 3.8.3 will

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.28 and SQLite 3.8.0.2

2014-01-27 Thread James Turner
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:01:42PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote: 2014-01-27 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: I think URL like:.../tree?ci=trunk will fail without 3.8.2. This is the url which uses WITHOUT ROWID